Teams

LA - Baby Got Backhand

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 2.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-09vs WC LA - Double the FunLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Ruben / Bahareh Saedi vs Cindy Emanuel / Amanda Lie4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYassi Vaziri / Michelle Sarraf vs Liz Piotrowski / Rachael Alberti1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Metaxas / LYNDA WEITZMAN vs Neha Desai / Berna Capo3-6, 3-6
2025-10-20vs LA - Mulholland 2.5WWon 20
W#2 DoublesRona Steinberg / Susanna Lovell vs Frangelica Goulding / Cassandra Jean Amell6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLYNDA WEITZMAN / Susan Troy vs Julie Tran / Sara Gershfeld6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMichelle Horvitz / Lisa Ruben vs Caroline Tran / Jennifer Win7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRona Steinberg / LYNDA WEITZMAN vs Melissa Turai / Homa Alamdari1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Troy / Laura Maffeo vs Alyssa Jeong Perry / Angelique Cabral6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Susanna Lovell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Bahareh Saedi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Michelle Horvitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Michelle Sarraf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Lisa Ruben
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Rona Steinberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Judy Mclellan
published
2.22
Laura Maffeo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.96
Kathy Metaxas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eunjeong Kim
published
Jessica Samuel
published
LYNDA WEITZMAN
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Troy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susanne Zenker
published
Yassi Vaziri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ruben + Michelle Horvitz134 matchesnot enough data
LYNDA WEITZMAN + Rona Steinberg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susanna Lovell
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Bahareh Saedi
0W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Horvitz
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Michelle Sarraf
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
Lisa Ruben
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
Rona Steinberg
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Judy Mclellan
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Laura Maffeo
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Kathy Metaxas
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Eunjeong Kim
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Samuel
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
LYNDA WEITZMAN
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Troy
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susanne Zenker
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yassi Vaziri
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.