Teams

PINELLAS/Romero

2022 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 7.5 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.86 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-04vs Seminole's Perfect ComboSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDori Hazama / Victoria Romero Lara vs Diana Zarreke / January Moennig3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEileen Rodriguez / Leticia Leppert vs Tiffany Rhodes / Deborah Larsen6-1, 6-2
2022-12-03vs McMullen SenoritasLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeticia Leppert / Harriet Cregann vs Kirsten Willis / Wendy Unger6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-11-05vs SPTC JohnsonWon 20
W#2 DoublesLeticia Leppert / Harriet Cregann vs Diane Haymes / Virginie Khare6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLisa Hueholt / Jane Maxwell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeticia Leppert / Marie Bialousz vs Susan Evans / Yve Feinberg6-3, 6-3
2022-10-22vs McMullen SenoritasLost 01
L#2 DoublesDori Hazama / Marie Bialousz vs Kirsten Willis / Wendy Unger6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-24vs ELW Grand SlammersLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Brooks / Jane Maxwell vs Sigrid Bratic / Amy Burns3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Leticia Leppert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Amy Brooks
published 4
3.74
Cindy Swartz
published 4
3.72
Kelly Armagost
published
3.58
Chieko Perry
published 4
3.56
Harriet Cregann
published 4
3.51
Melissa Voelker
published
3.48
3.38
Marie Bialousz
published
3.37
Jane Maxwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Dori Hazama
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lisa Hueholt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dori Hazama + Jane Maxwell3246% gamesnot enough data
Leticia Leppert + Amy Brooks213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Voelker + Cindy Swartz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leticia Leppert
211W–99L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Amy Brooks
22W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Cindy Swartz
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Chieko Perry
80W–103L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Harriet Cregann
9W–17L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.56
Melissa Voelker
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
Victoria Romero Lara
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
Marie Bialousz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Jane Maxwell
114W–96L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Dori Hazama
199W–167L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Hueholt
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.