Teams

Payne Park Hazel

2025 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Winter Weekend · 3.0 W Saturday

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-08vs Payne Park AveryLost 01
L#1 DoublesSummer Bloom / Lindsay Perez vs Patty Avery / Rebecca Zion2-6, 5-7
2025-03-01vs SSC TruexWon 10
W#1 DoublesSummer Bloom / Michelle Woodger vs Kate Khaleel / Lorraine Forzani6-3, 6-4
2025-02-22vs SSC Grossman 40Won 31
W#1 DoublesSarah Hazel / Novatra Soraya vs Eileen Grossman / Julie Turner6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Woodger vs Mary Scott6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElena Gutkin / Laura Neutzling vs Patricia Carothers / Diane da Costa6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMeredith Ansenberger / Daria Ferreira vs Laurie Coleman / Cindy Connelly1-6, 4-6
2025-02-08Won 10
W#1 SinglesSummer Bloom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-01vs SSC Grossman 40Split 22
W#1 DoublesAlina Fotache / Novatra Soraya vs Mary Scott / Kristine Tabone6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Woodger vs Cindy Connelly6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJill Alibrandi / Erika Cvencek vs Kama Kett / Patricia Carothers4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVeronica Hohlt / Woomee Yu vs Jacqueline Moore / Delesa Morris1-6, 3-6
2025-01-25vs Payne Park AveryLost 01
L#1 DoublesSummer Bloom / Erika Cvencek vs Bev Murray / Thao Ross1-6, 4-6
2025-01-11vs SSC Grossman 40Won 10
W#2 DoublesLindsay Perez / Summer Bloom vs Eileen Grossman / Kristine Tabone6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Sarah Hazel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Alina Fotache
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Summer Bloom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.00
Lindsay Perez
published
3.00
Michelle Woodger
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Novatra Soraya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Ashlee Binns
published 3
2.75
Laura Neutzling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Meredith Ansenberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Veronica Hohlt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
RENEE NADIV
published
Elena Gutkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Erika Cvencek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Alibrandi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lucy Wong
published
Woomee Yu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Perez + Summer Bloom4264% games+17.9% vs expected
Sarah Hazel + Meredith Ansenberger033 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Perez + Veronica Hohlt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Hazel
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Alina Fotache
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3
Summer Bloom
25W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Lindsay Perez
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Michelle Woodger
17W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Novatra Soraya
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.97
3
Ashlee Binns
7W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Laura Neutzling
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Meredith Ansenberger
8W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Veronica Hohlt
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
RENEE NADIV
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Elena Gutkin
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Erika Cvencek
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jill Alibrandi
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lucy Wong
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Woomee Yu
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.