Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Nickerson

2024 CV Fall Combo Doubles · CV-Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-17vs CV-Palm Valley CC/Laura WalkerWon 10
W#2 DoublesNatalie Nofsinger / Elizabeth Hester vs Julee Moore / Denise Roethenmund6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hester / Natalie Nofsinger vs Monica Solis / Nancy Whittaker3-6, 2-6
2024-11-19vs CV-Palm Valley CC/Laura WalkerLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Nofsinger / Catherine Petitti vs Alisa Sajadi / Kathy Schwalbe3-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesKelly Walecki / Natalie Nofsinger vs Patrice Jackson / Jennifer Bouffard6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesNatalie Nofsinger / Julianna Rose vs Deb Garris / Katherine Misskelley7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulianna Rose / Suzy Skone vs Terry Castro-Oistad / Jane LaRue6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Julianna Rose
published
3.26
Lesley Gagnon
published
3.22
Suzanne Young
published
3.20
Natalie Nofsinger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Shannon McFarlin
published
3.10
Kathy Buller
published
3.06
Suzy Skone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Kelly Walecki
published
2.83
Elizabeth Hester
published 3
Janette Lyons
published
Janneche Nevin
published
Sherri Nickerson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon McFarlin + Elizabeth Hester314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julianna Rose
28W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
Lesley Gagnon
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
Suzanne Young
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Natalie Nofsinger
32W–48L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Shannon McFarlin
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Kathy Buller
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Suzy Skone
36W–74L career · 1 line in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
Kelly Walecki
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Elizabeth Hester
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
Janette Lyons
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janneche Nevin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherri Nickerson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.