Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Assemi/Handlon

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.57 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-01vs Ivory Ridge-Widtfeldt/BurdgeLost 02
L#1 SinglesAllison Kendell vs Lisa Willes6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Sweat / Laurie Summers vs Sara Madsen / Heather Cottrell3-6, 2-6
2021-05-25Split 11
W#2 SinglesAngie Christensen vs Annette Knight6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Kendell / Christine Dunn vs Diane Creamer / Kristen Okland5-7, 1-6
2021-05-18vs Park City MARC-Leigh/EpsteinWon 20
W#2 DoublesAllison Kendell / Jennifer Sweat vs Kelley Epstein / AMy Huish0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAngie Christensen vs Jutien Page6-3, 6-2
2021-05-11vs Spanish Fork-Westover/BarberSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAngie Christensen vs Lauren Rawlings3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Summers / Mindi Paskins vs Marilyn Patch / Melanie Hall6-4, 6-1
2021-05-04Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAllison Kendell vs Amber Greenwood3-6, 6-7
2021-04-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesAngie Christensen vs Kristy Simmons5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-04-20Split 11
W#2 SinglesAngie Christensen vs Malisa Bowen7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLaurie Summers / Jennifer Sweat vs Maria Lombardi / Michelle Maxfield5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2021-04-13Won 10
W#1 SinglesAngie Christensen vs Angela Bleak6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angie Christensen
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.66
Janie Ontiveros
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
3.28
Janice Stokes-Burns
usually #1 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
Allison Kendell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Beata Kieffer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.21
Lauren Annunziata
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.09
Maryam Klock
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Mindi Paskins
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Jennifer Sweat
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Charlotte Legg
published
Laurie Summers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Namrata Handlon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Shoeleh Assemi
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Namrata Handlon + Mindi Paskins9557% games+12.4% vs expected
Beata Kieffer + Janice Stokes-Burns14560% games+9.2% vs expected
Shoeleh Assemi + Janice Stokes-Burns5453% games+4.9% vs expected
Beata Kieffer + Mindi Paskins5260% games+4.8% vs expected
Mindi Paskins + Janice Stokes-Burns5360% games+4.0% vs expected
Namrata Handlon + Shoeleh Assemi9851% games+2.9% vs expected
Namrata Handlon + Allison Kendell8652% games+2.5% vs expected
Laurie Summers + Maryam Klock9549% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Christensen
44W–18L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Janie Ontiveros
22W–14L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Janice Stokes-Burns
132W–134L career · 11 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Allison Kendell
74W–56L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Beata Kieffer
55W–50L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Lauren Annunziata
136W–138L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Maryam Klock
77W–92L career · 4 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Mindi Paskins
238W–179L career · 9 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Sweat
135W–130L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
2.96
Charlotte Legg
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laurie Summers
46W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Namrata Handlon
62W–57L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shoeleh Assemi
37W–81L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.