Teams

SAN FRAN ST U 18AW5.0A

2026 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 5.0

20 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-14vs HARBOR PT 18AW5.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesCara Chinn / Samantha Nady vs Jamilah Karah / Camilla Tarpey-Schwed1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTanima Joshi / Elani Phan vs Jennifer Rogers / Janine Schiess6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-06vs GOLDMAN TC 18AW5.0AWon 21
L#1 DoublesNithila Asokaraj / Catharine Sabaitis vs Debbie Gersten / Angela Chen3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNora Engelmann vs Ceara Howey6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMariam Nechiporuk / Katerina Ng vs Romina Clarke / Wendi Webster Green6-3, 7-6
2026-05-24vs HARBOR PT 18AW5.0ASplit 11
L#1 SinglesCara Chinn vs Leora Grimshaw3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMariam Nechiporuk / Hillary McKinney vs Alison Comfort / Jennifer Azevedo6-1, 6-2
2026-05-17vs HARBOR PT 18AW5.0ALost 03
L#1 DoublesKaterina Ng / Kristine Pau vs Jamilah Karah / Camilla Tarpey-Schwed6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMalaika Stoll vs Leora Grimshaw0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Nady / Catharine Sabaitis vs Wendy Stovell / Lisa Everest3-6, 0-6
2026-05-16vs GOLDMAN TC 18AW5.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesHillary McKinney / Elani Phan vs Katharine Dicconson / Megan Tang2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesNora Engelmann vs Lindsay Huang6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPersimmon Tobing / Katerina Ng vs Ingrid Ballus Armet / Jillian Santos4-6, 6-7
2026-05-10vs GOLDMAN TC 18AW5.0ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesHillary McKinney / Katerina Ng vs Katharine Dicconson / Wendi Webster Green2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesNora Engelmann vs Lindsay Huang6-1, 6-2
2026-05-03vs HARBOR PT 18AW5.0ALost 12
W#1 DoublesNora Engelmann / Mariam Nechiporuk vs Georgina Goldman / Alison Revell6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMalaika Stoll vs Camilla Tarpey-Schwed1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCara Chinn / Tanima Joshi vs Mary Graber / Julia Moser1-6, 1-6
2026-05-02vs HARBOR PT 18AW5.0AWon 21
L#1 DoublesTiffany Liew / Catharine Sabaitis vs Alison Comfort / Camilla Tarpey-Schwed4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNora Engelmann vs Fanny Gamble6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMariam Nechiporuk / Elani Phan vs Jennifer Azevedo / Leora Grimshaw6-2, 6-4
2026-04-26vs GOLDMAN TC 18AW5.0ALost 02
L#1 SinglesCara Chinn vs Lindsay Huang1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Villanueva / Nithila Asokaraj vs Lucy Nutting / Jillian Santos0-6, 1-6
2026-04-25vs GOLDMAN TC 18AW5.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesElani Phan / Tanima Joshi vs Lucy Nutting / Alison Rauh5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristine Pau / Nithila Asokaraj vs Ingrid Ballus Armet / Romina Clarke1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · Women's 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GOLDMAN TC 18AW5.0A9124616200
2SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW5.0B8222819205
3WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AW5.0A8222822200
4SUNNYVALE MTC 18AW5.0A64151533279
5HARBOR PT 18AW5.0A46131739276
6SAN FRAN ST U 18AW5.0A2882244295
7SAN PABLO PK 18AW5.0A2882246299
8CUESTA TC 18AW5.0A1982247309

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Nora Engelmann
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.86
Mariam Nechiporuk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.77
Persimmon Tobing
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
4.75
Brigitte Desnoes
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.67
Hillary McKinney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.56
Danielle Caro
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.52
Katerina Ng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.49
Catharine Sabaitis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.48
Tanima Joshi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.45
Samantha Nady
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.41
Kristine Pau
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.39
Nithila Asokaraj
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.21
Cara Chinn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.15
Malaika Stoll
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.09
Kristin Villanueva
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.06
Tiffany Liew
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
4.02
Elani Phan
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
3.73
Helen Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Grace Hruska
published
Rupika Pendyala
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Persimmon Tobing + Brigitte Desnoes134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nora Engelmann
9W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.88
Mariam Nechiporuk
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.86
Persimmon Tobing
6W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Brigitte Desnoes
4W–10L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.75
Hillary McKinney
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Danielle Caro
7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.56
Katerina Ng
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.52
5
Catharine Sabaitis
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.49
Tanima Joshi
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.48
Samantha Nady
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.45
Kristine Pau
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.41
Nithila Asokaraj
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.39
5
Cara Chinn
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.21
Malaika Stoll
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
4.15
Kristin Villanueva
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.09
Tiffany Liew
14W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.06
Elani Phan
13W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Helen Zhang
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.73
Grace Hruska
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rupika Pendyala
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.