Teams

Thai Topaz

2025 Tri-Level League · Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.69 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-13vs Washed-up BanditsLost 01
L#3 DoublesEnrique Casas Jimenez / Gabriel Gonzales vs Elkin Echeverri / Troy Gonzalez3-6, 2-6
2024-10-11vs Nett NutzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBenito Pelayo / Tom McCloy vs Mario Morales / Landon Blair6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGabriel Gonzales / Enrique Casas Jimenez vs Ralph Urias / Brian Chase6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
David Thanairongroj
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Benito Pelayo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Rene Candelaria
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Esteban Casas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Clint Huang
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Michael Weinberg
published
3.59
Tom McCloy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Gabriel Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Leonard Shields
published
Enrique Casas Jimenez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Brijesh Tripathi
published 3.5
3.12
Abhijit Apte
published 3.5
Jason Walters
published
Robert Judkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Thanairongroj + Rene Candelaria213 matchesnot enough data
Gabriel Gonzales + Enrique Casas Jimenez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Thanairongroj
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Benito Pelayo
23W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
Rene Candelaria
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.81
3.5
Esteban Casas
13W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.78
4
Clint Huang
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Weinberg
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Tom McCloy
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Gabriel Gonzales
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Leonard Shields
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Enrique Casas Jimenez
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Brijesh Tripathi
6W–18L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Abhijit Apte
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jason Walters
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Judkins
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.