Teams

ESB:Tulip Tennis Club:Schneider/Cotroneo

2026 VT Adult 18 & Over Women · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-16vs ESB:Court Authority:CawleySplit 22
L#1 DoublesFay Leuck / Megan Shrestha vs Jennifer Weiss / Jude Melen0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEdye Graning / Cindy Maynard vs Laura Williams / Aimee Babbott6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJudith Wimble vs Jill Dunn0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesOlivia Schneider / Melissa Thomas vs Cindy Fonseca / Natasha Tarrant6-1, 6-0
2026-05-03vs ESB:Court Authority:CawleySplit 22
L#1 DoublesMelissa Thomas / Judith Wimble vs Kim McManus / Laura Williams6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKate Kenny vs Jennifer Weiss7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy Maynard / Edye Graning vs Jeanne Blackmore / Cindy Fonseca4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Rouleau / Fay Leuck vs Natasha Tarrant / Aimee Babbott6-1, 6-2
2026-05-02vs ESB:Court Authority:CawleyLost 23
L#1 DoublesMaggie Egger / Carol Backs vs Kim McManus / Jennifer Weiss7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBree Cotroneo vs Helga Immerfall3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKate Kenny / Fay Leuck vs Aimee Babbott / Jude Melen3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesStephanie Rouleau vs Benita Schachter6-4, 5-4
L#3 DoublesMegan Shrestha / Sue Schulze vs Laura Williams / Laura Cawley6-7, 5-4, 0-1
2026-04-19vs ESB:Court Authority:CawleyLost 04
L#1 DoublesStephanie Rouleau / Edye Graning vs Helga Immerfall / Stacy Lebaron6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBree Cotroneo vs Jill Dunn3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKate Kenny / Olivia Schneider vs Jeanne Blackmore / Laura Cawley1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSue Schulze vs Kim McManus4-6, 5-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESB:Court Authority:Cawley3113720162
2ESB:Tulip Tennis Club:Schneider/Cotroneo1371329196

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Stephanie Rouleau
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Kate Kenny
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.79
Bree Cotroneo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
Carol Backs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cindy Maynard
published 4
3.70
Olivia Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Sue Schulze
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Judith Wimble
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.45
Maggie Egger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Fay Leuck
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Edye Graning
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Megan Shrestha
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olivia Schneider + Kate Kenny224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Rouleau
42W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
Kate Kenny
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Bree Cotroneo
3W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Carol Backs
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Cindy Maynard
9W–22L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Olivia Schneider
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Sue Schulze
53W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
Judith Wimble
17W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Maggie Egger
40W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.45
Fay Leuck
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
3.33
Edye Graning
37W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Megan Shrestha
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.