Teams

RMTC NAVY

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-22vs LTA-Q NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ufland / Mary Jensen vs Gretchen Blair / Teri Ohan5-7, 4-6
2023-06-15vs CVTA REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Ufland / Ilse Hine vs Michelle Wieber / Lindsey Cheney6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesYun Wait / Chelsea Sump vs Patricia Jamison / Kirsten Roeber6-3, 3-1
2023-06-08vs BRMST NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ufland / Allison Becker vs Noelle Anthony / Melissa Clarke2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Travis / Veronique Foulon vs Stacey Mari / Kathy Schmidt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-25vs LTA-Q GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ufland / Allison Becker vs Lynn Schulte / Catherine Romero7-6, 7-6
2023-05-24vs LTA-Q ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ufland / Ruth Weinberg vs Christine Payne / Kelly Mcreynolds6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVeronique Foulon / Chelsea Sump vs Denise Simonsen / Mona Jones7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-18vs BRMST TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Ufland / Thanyanat LeBlang vs Michele Gosselin / Gail Quinn4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Ferry / Chelsea Sump vs Erin Kintzle / Laura Tedesco6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
3.79
Jennifer Ufland
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
Allison Becker
published 4
3.73
Veronique Foulon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Chelsea Sump
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Mary Jensen
published
3.57
Nancy Travis
published
3.21
Ruth Weinberg
published
Kim Ferry
published
Yun Wait
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Ufland + Chelsea Sump2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Thanyanat LeBlang
36W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Jennifer Ufland
70W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Allison Becker
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Veronique Foulon
48W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Chelsea Sump
34W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Mary Jensen
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Nancy Travis
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Ruth Weinberg
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Kim Ferry
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Yun Wait
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.