Teams

MVC Cole SSL A40-3.5W

2024 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 3.5 W (6 player)

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-06-19vs WH Scheonrock SSL A40-3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Fouty / Rennae Cole vs Lori Green / Corin Nulty0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDanuta Radzio / Kimberly Johnson vs Kimberly KIngsbury Curvelo / Christine Mahaney6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRita Rodriguez / Anne Neis vs Aline Reinartz / Patricia Guernsey2-6, 0-6
2024-06-12vs ML Congleton SSL A40-3.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Johnson / Pam Kloet vs Kathleen Stockall / Jodi Wujkowski6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGayl Kessel / Susana Doelder vs Sally Beebe / Laurie Fata6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnne Neis / Pam Rush vs Jamie Hartman Ring / Patti Congleton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-05vs PY Lekosiotis SSL A40-3.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesPam Kloet / Kimberly Johnson vs Susan Baird / Cary Sullivan6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPauline Unfried / Fiona Hert vs Linda Scannell / Carmen Harris3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Herremans / Tracie Riebschleger vs Yit-Yian Lua / Elizabeth Lekosiotis3-6, 1-6
2024-05-29vs MVH Burnet SSL A40-3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Fouty / Becky Kuhn vs Luann Mullen / Marta Stanley6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJudy Siegel / Pauline Unfried vs Mary Burnet / Katie Hartgerink6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaurie Herremans / Anne Neis vs Janet McNamara / Ann Radke3-6, 2-6
2024-05-15vs MVC Tsutsumi Buckhold SSL A40-3.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesRennae Cole / Gayl Kessel vs Beth Balon / Michelle Madden2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBecky Kuhn / Pam Rush vs Dawn Wolownik / Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRita Rodriguez / Kelli Kovack vs Patricia Hunnewell / Brenda Stagg2-6, 0-6
2024-05-08vs HC Needham SSL A40-3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Johnson / Becky Kuhn vs Kerri Stoel / Michelle Daane2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRennae Cole / Judy Siegel vs Yoko Hescott / Tracy Harrison0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPauline Unfried / Tracie Riebschleger vs Erin Needham / Lynn Roelofs6-4, 6-3
2024-05-01vs PA Burdo SSL A40-3.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesPam Kloet / Kimberly Johnson vs Mary Burdo / Cara Dykstra6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusana Doelder / Danuta Radzio vs Mary Applehof / Volita Vinoski6-7, 3-4
W#3 DoublesKelli Kovack / Tracie Riebschleger vs Suzette Adams / Jill Grung6-4, 6-3
2024-04-10vs MY Carr SSL A40-3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanuta Radzio / Tracie Riebschleger vs Diane Dirette / Betty Trebing5-7, 4-4
L#2 DoublesErin Fouty / Susana Doelder vs Pamela Butt / Diane Langejans3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPauline Unfried / Lisa Kerr vs Shannon Carr / Lori Earls6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-27vs MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Fouty / Kimberly Johnson vs Jennifer Chiodini / Kristen Schestag4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Siegel / Pauline Unfried vs Kate Vincent / Lillian Jackson6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaurie Herremans / Anne Neis vs Sandra Huffman / Linda Miller-Heys3-6, 7-5
2023-05-17vs PA Burdo SSL A40-3.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesRennae Cole / Gretchen Asfour vs Ruth Kohley / Karen Hoffman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Neis / Pam Rush vs Mary Burdo / Volita Vinoski5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFiona Hert / Judy Siegel vs Tracy Sodini / Mary Applehof5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WMI SSL A40&O 3.5 W (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVC Tsutsumi Buckhold SSL A40-3.5W8118923222
2HC Needham SSL A40-3.5W7219818208
3WH Scheonrock SSL A40-3.5W7218926211
4PY Lekosiotis SSL A40-3.5W63161126211
5MVH Burnet SSL A40-3.5W45121536254
6PA Burdo SSL A40-3.5W36121533254
7MVS Vincent SSL A40-3.5W36111637274
8MY Carr SSL A40-3.5W3681940266
9MVC Cole SSL A40-3.5W27101735257
10ML Congleton SSL A40-3.5W27111639268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Danuta Radzio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Erin Fouty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Pam Kloet
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Pam Rush
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Pauline Unfried
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
Gayl Kessel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.18
Becky Kuhn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Tracie Riebschleger
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Kelli Kovack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Lisa Kerr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Judy Siegel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Rennae Cole
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Susana Doelder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Fiona Hert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Rita Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Anne Neis
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Laurie Herremans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pauline Unfried + Tracie Riebschleger8064% games+10.1% vs expected
Gayl Kessel + Judy Siegel3255% games+7.5% vs expected
Anne Neis + Lisa Kerr3349% games+6.6% vs expected
Kelli Kovack + Tracie Riebschleger5649% games+6.5% vs expected
Anne Neis + Pam Kloet13365% games+5.5% vs expected
Erin Fouty + Danuta Radzio4646% games+3.6% vs expected
Gayl Kessel + Rennae Cole141154% games+3.1% vs expected
Pauline Unfried + Kelli Kovack3350% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danuta Radzio
111W–109L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Erin Fouty
59W–94L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Pam Kloet
233W–114L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Pam Rush
104W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Pauline Unfried
225W–165L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Gayl Kessel
129W–140L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Becky Kuhn
49W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Tracie Riebschleger
62W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Kelli Kovack
38W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Lisa Kerr
36W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Judy Siegel
71W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Rennae Cole
94W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Susana Doelder
99W–134L career · 3 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Fiona Hert
72W–71L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
Rita Rodriguez
58W–40L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Anne Neis
73W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Herremans
20W–93L career · 3 lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.