Teams

BBTL55/Stone/Dataw

55 & Over · 55 & Over 9.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18vs LCTA55/McKay/Wild DunesLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Stone / Allan Robinson vs Russell Bridgham / Todd Hall6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn McSween / Bill Higgs vs George Jarck / Frank Larkin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Holland / Brent Borchert vs Rhett Hancock / Shawn Holland4-6, 1-6
2025-05-18vs LCTA55/Viljac/MPRDWon 21
L#1 DoublesBill Higgs / Brent Borchert vs Harvey Hines / Troy Marguglio2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTodd Stone / John McSween vs Michael Viljac / Robert Russell7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKevin McGuire / David Holland vs Daniel Strickland / Richard Owens6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-17vs LLAS UPTA55A/WeinerWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllan Robinson / Bill Higgs vs Lee Chapman / Andrew Weiner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTodd Stone / Kevin McGuire vs John Jennings / Timothy Stewart1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Holland / Brent Borchert vs Barney Pannell / Christopher Chase6-3, 6-3
2025-05-17vs CTL55/EAKER/WRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin McGuire / John McSween vs Jeffrey Hook / Joseph Stricklin7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBill Higgs / Todd Stone vs Gerald Sitton / Scott Swanson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 9.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allan Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Brent Borchert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Todd Stone
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.08
Bill Higgs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
David Holland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
John McSween
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin McGuire
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bill Higgs + Todd Stone224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allan Robinson
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brent Borchert
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
Todd Stone
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
4.11
4.5
Bill Higgs
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
4.08
4
David Holland
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
John McSween
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin McGuire
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.