Teams

Webster 40s 4.0M Wed PM

2026 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-04-22vs Beuchler/Sherwood 40s 4.0M Wed PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesTony Lancaster / Ken Questell vs Art Fadde / Brian McLeod3-6, 2-6
2026-04-08vs Jackson 40s 4.0M Wed PMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatt Mallard / Steve Webster vs Anthony Jackson / Ted Irvin5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesPeter Glud / Tony Lancaster vs Ken Chambers / Scott Laughlin4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 40 & Over Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Todd Trifari
published
3.82
Ken Questell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Eric Nocera
published
3.63
Jeff Payne
published
3.52
Peter Glud
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Matt Mallard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Robert Ferree
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.46
Matthew Cochran
published
3.31
Tony Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.17
Eric Carwile
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tony Lancaster + Ken Questell7749% games+1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Todd Trifari
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.85
Ken Questell
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Eric Nocera
17W–24L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Jeff Payne
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.63
Peter Glud
16W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Matt Mallard
4W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
60%40%<1%
3.46
Robert Ferree
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Matthew Cochran
13W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Tony Lancaster
25W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Eric Carwile
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.