Teams

Ma.Roschel18S

2025 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-07vs Jo.Hastings18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesChris Wandor vs Brooks Lowe2-6, 3-6
2025-09-30vs Sh.Robert18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesMarcelo Roschel vs Joseph Hollingsworth5-7, 3-6
2025-09-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesJohn-Michael O'Neill vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-02vs Mi.Elstob18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesJohn-Michael O'Neill vs Scott Hoffman7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Ad.Whitesell18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesMarcelo Roschel vs David Gorman6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesChris Wandor vs Marc Best7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-19vs Jo.Hastings18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesChris Wandor vs Amir Lyall3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMarcelo Roschel vs Brooks Lowe6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesJohn-Michael O'Neill vs Thomas Albertson5-7, 6-7
2025-08-12vs Sh.Robert18SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesChris Wandor vs Sheldon Roberts0-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesMarcelo Roschel vs Taylor Atherton1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Charley Yu
published 4
3.67
Marcelo Roschel
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.54
David Monk
published 3.5
3.41
Chris Wandor
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.37
John-Michael O'Neill
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Hamilton Garvey
published
2.88
Brendan OConnor
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcelo Roschel + Chris Wandor134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charley Yu
3W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Marcelo Roschel
115W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
David Monk
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Chris Wandor
51W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
John-Michael O'Neill
29W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Hamilton Garvey
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3
Brendan OConnor
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.