Teams

DE - Baker

2026 Decatur Spring Adult 55 and Over · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-09vs Roberts 3.5 55 SpringLost 12
L#1 DoublesDoug Nunnally / Karl King vs David Collis / Newell Johnson3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKeith Estes / Byron Todd vs Shannon Sutton / George Ho-Tung6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEugene McNutt / Gordon Siek vs Michael Gibson / Jeff Griffis6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-04-04vs Roberts 3.5 55 SpringLost 12
L#1 DoublesGordon Siek / David Simmons vs Mike McCann / Stephen Crowell6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPerry Baker / Eugene McNutt vs Michael Gibson / Chuck Lamar5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJamie Kelly / Karl King vs Vu Pham / Newell Johnson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-29vs Roberts 3.5 55 SpringLost 12
W#1 DoublesGordon Siek / David Simmons vs Michael Gibson / Troy Butler7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Estes / Michael Perry vs Newell Johnson / Mike McCann2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Williams / Perry Baker vs David Collis / Stephen Crowell5-7, 2-6
2026-03-25vs Roberts 3.5 55 SpringLost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Kelly / Charles Cappelletti vs Newell Johnson / Mike McCann6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDoug Nunnally / Paul Williams vs David Collis / Stephen Crowell7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPerry Baker / Keith Estes vs Frank Roberts / Chuck Lamar6-2, 6-2
2026-03-21vs Roberts 3.5 55 SpringWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Perry / Craig Hovan vs Frank Roberts / George Ho-Tung4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Simmons / Gordon Siek vs Stephen Crowell / Andrew Plankenhorn2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-16vs Roberts 3.5 55 SpringWon 30
W#1 DoublesJamie Kelly / Charles Cappelletti vs George Ho-Tung / Newell Johnson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCraig Hovan / Byron Todd vs David Collis / Chuck Lamar6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul Williams / Perry Baker vs Allen Hines / Jeff Griffis6-1, 6-2
2026-03-07vs Roberts 3.5 55 SpringWon 21
L#1 DoublesEugene McNutt / Gordon Siek vs Andrew Plankenhorn / Mike McCann6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Simmons / Michael Perry vs Frank Roberts / George Ho-Tung6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Hovan / Karl King vs Shannon Sutton / Vu Pham3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Roberts 3.5 55 SpringWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Simmons / Doug Nunnally vs Frank Roberts / Shannon Sutton6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Perry / Craig Hovan vs Michael Gibson / Allen Hines6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPaul Williams / Gordon Siek vs Troy Butler / Chuck Lamar1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DE - Baker44141026205
2Roberts 3.5 55 Spring44101432237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Craig Hovan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
Charles Cappelletti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Doug Nunnally
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Perry Baker
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.37
Karl King
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Keith Estes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Michael Perry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
David Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Gordon Siek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Eugene McNutt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Byron Todd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karl King + Craig Hovan404 matchesnot enough data
David Simmons + Karl King213 matchesnot enough data
David Simmons + Gordon Siek213 matchesnot enough data
Doug Nunnally + Karl King123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Craig Hovan
88W–60L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Charles Cappelletti
50W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Doug Nunnally
53W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Perry Baker
25W–38L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
Karl King
70W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Keith Estes
16W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Michael Perry
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
David Simmons
18W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Gordon Siek
8W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Eugene McNutt
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Byron Todd
10W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.