Teams

PIPER PK 18AW3.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Nadine Johnson
published
3.44
Colleen Sonneborn
published 3.5
Adriana Cox
published 3.5
3.16
Nina Kim
published
2.99
Liana Buttles
published
2.98
Alison Bricker
published 3
2.93
Tabatha Kallman
published
2.82
Kelly Dwinells
published
2.82
Joanne Hernon
published
Ann Rose Boas
published 3
2.68
Tanja Ross
published
2.64
Cori Ladd
published 3
2.56
Kelli Fleitas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Sonneborn + Nina Kim7356% games+8.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nadine Johnson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Colleen Sonneborn
28W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Adriana Cox
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nina Kim
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Liana Buttles
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Alison Bricker
8W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
Tabatha Kallman
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kelly Dwinells
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
Joanne Hernon
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Ann Rose Boas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tanja Ross
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Cori Ladd
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.64
Kelli Fleitas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.