Teams

CCV Cooper

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weekday · Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday

10 players · average NTRP 4.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesTeresa Whitworth / Beth Robbins vs Jennifer Smith / Kelly Stalls6-2, 6-3
2022-10-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Robbins / Sarah O'Neill vs Cherie Lane / Laura Earley6-4, 6-4
2022-10-17vs Raintree MorrisLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Robbins / Genevieve Alley vs April Kim / Lauren McCormick3-6, 4-6
2022-10-14vs Westwood HauseSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlice Cooper / Beth Robbins vs Laura Perry / Lauren Nowlin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Whitworth / Elizabeth Martin vs Brigitte Fanelli / Rene Philhower4-6, 3-6
2022-10-07vs Hermitage HolmesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlice Cooper / Beth Robbins vs Michelle Holmes / Lindsey Genter4-6, 3-6
2022-09-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Robbins / Genevieve Alley vs Suzanne Spiller / Nina Sjogren2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Cooper
published 4.5
4.22
Genevieve Alley
published 4.5
4.19
Beth Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Sarah O'Neill
published
Teresa Whitworth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Mary Beth Scott
published
3.33
Kristin Mullins
published
3.25
Windy Campbell
published
3.17
Shula Good
published
Susan Trigg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Whitworth + Beth Robbins224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alice Cooper
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Genevieve Alley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Beth Robbins
48W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Sarah O'Neill
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
Teresa Whitworth
26W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Beth Scott
13W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
Kristin Mullins
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Windy Campbell
5W–17L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Shula Good
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
Susan Trigg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.