Teams

SCHAEFER/ BRILL- River Creek

2023 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-10vs McMULLEN/ PLACE - BroadlandsWon 10
W#1 DoublesTara Brill / Coni Schaefer vs Lindsey Frye / Stephanie Place6-3, 6-1
2023-06-28Won 10
W#1 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Andrea Bauer7-6, 6-1
2023-06-26vs KANE/CHANG - TRUMPLost 02
L#1 DoublesTara Brill / Paige Fishel vs Tina Woods / Ashley Plexico6-3, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJosephine Hughes / Rachel McMichael vs Nancy Sicairos / Alexandra Kardasilari4-6, 3-6
2023-06-23vs SMITH/ DIRENZO - AVSPLost 01
L#3 DoublesRachel McMichael / Josephine Hughes vs Shannon Pettit / Mary Beth Greason3-6, 4-6
2023-06-21vs O'BRIEN/ STANLEY- IDA LEEWon 10
W#1 SinglesEleanor McManus vs Julie Kyle6-3, 6-4
2023-06-19vs MARCOTTE - Hidden Creek CCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKendall Mccaughey / Tara Brill vs Kristi Nault / Joanne Good6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Murray / Josephine Hughes vs Wendy Rose / Britt Ellinger5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Susan Speciale
published
3.70
Tara Brill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.54
Kendall Mccaughey
published
3.36
Tina Le
published
3.27
Eleanor McManus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Kathleen McFarlane
published
3.17
Coni Schaefer
published 3.5
3.13
Kimberly Murray
published
3.12
Lisa Moffett
published
3.10
Christine Feit
published 3.5
3.08
Josephine Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
2.97
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Moffett + Jeannie Matteson123 matchesnot enough data
Josephine Hughes + Kimberly Murray033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Speciale
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Tara Brill
125W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kendall Mccaughey
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
Tina Le
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Eleanor McManus
187W–113L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Kathleen McFarlane
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Coni Schaefer
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Kimberly Murray
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Lisa Moffett
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Christine Feit
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Josephine Hughes
76W–105L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.