Teams

Jax Golf - Merriam

2023 Duval Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-30vs Jack Russell - DrabLost 01
L#2 DoublesKismet Miller / Michael Mayer vs Aura Bernal / John Dondero5-7, 3-6
2023-06-16vs Sawgrass - GibsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Lynch / Kismet Miller vs Tyler Toby / Aisling Toby5-7, 2-6
2023-05-12vs San Jose - CochranLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Lynch / Linda Valinho vs Russell Healey / Katharine Healey4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Bill Merriam
published 4
3.56
Eric Lazo
published
3.46
Annie DeStefano
published 3.5
3.44
Andrea Mayer
published 3.5
3.41
Amelia Hernandez
published 3.5
3.33
Lyle Hursey
published
3.27
Lisa Woods
published
3.26
Michael Hernandez
published
3.25
Michael Mayer
published
3.21
Fermin Mendez
published
3.18
Linda Valinho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kismet Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Michelle Mendez
published
2.73
Michael Bosshart
published
Patricia Engel
published
Theresa Merriam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Mayer + Lyle Hursey2348% gamesnot enough data
Michael Mayer + Lisa Woods123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill Merriam
89W–89L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Eric Lazo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Annie DeStefano
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Andrea Mayer
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Amelia Hernandez
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
3.41
Lyle Hursey
21W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Lisa Woods
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.27
Michael Hernandez
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Michael Mayer
16W–27L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Fermin Mendez
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Linda Valinho
92W–72L career · 1 line in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Kismet Miller
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Michelle Mendez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Allison Carbonneau
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Michael Bosshart
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Engel
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Theresa Merriam
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.