Teams

Edge Combo

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-04vs Tennis SharksLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Claire Merril vs Karyn DeVito / Tara Reynolds7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-11-30vs Anything But NetLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy McDonald / Karyn Ialeggio vs Kimberly Klimek / Susan Kiernan6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-11-14vs Making a RacketLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Sandy Schefkind vs Tina Halley / Anne Sherman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-11-06vs Chicks with SticksWon 10
W#1 DoublesClaire Merril / Karyn Ialeggio vs Lisa Raker / Linda Wimsatt7-6, 6-1
2023-10-24vs Alley CatsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaryn Ialeggio / Amy McDonald vs Sara Franklin / Julia Saperstein6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lisa Davison
published
3.46
Karyn Ialeggio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.43
Raina Fishbane
published
3.32
Claire Merril
published 3.5
3.25
Amy McDonald
published 3.5
3.16
DC Smith
published 3.5
2.95
Paula Pels
published
2.88
Renee Curlee
published
2.84
Kimberly Goldsteen
published
Julie Doll
published
Sandy Schefkind
published
Stacey Kohl
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Davison
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Karyn Ialeggio
45W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
Raina Fishbane
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Claire Merril
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amy McDonald
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
DC Smith
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Paula Pels
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
Renee Curlee
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
Kimberly Goldsteen
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
2.84
Julie Doll
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Schefkind
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacey Kohl
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.