Teams

Cheval Mixers - K. Sallings

2024 Hillsborough Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesDanielle Lindblom / Matthew Hayes vs Emory Colbert / Anne Kelley7-6, 6-2
2024-06-09vs HCC Overhead Squad 18 - R. RossLost 01
L#2 DoublesKen Patrick / Lorrie White vs Rafael Pagan / Lily Weidler3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKen Patrick / Lorrie White vs Amy Breck / Jon Brown6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hayes / Danielle Lindblom vs Emily Corbett / Fredrick Corbett1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-05-05vs Hills/Helme/18&Over7.0MXDWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Hayes / Danielle Lindblom vs Tu Phan / Beatriz Cardona3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-28vs Grand Hampton - A. BuitragoWon 10
W#2 DoublesKen Patrick / Lorrie White vs Michael Gauthier / Alys Klouse6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-21vs Apollo - S. PatrickWon 10
W#2 DoublesLorrie White / Ken Patrick vs Nicovi Singh / Jason Padua6-2, 6-3
2024-04-14vs TYCC Sunday Funday - C. SaylorWon 20
W#2 DoublesLorrie White / Ken Patrick vs Casey Saylor / Brent Saylor7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKalicharan Durgampudi / Danielle Lindblom vs Anne Kelley / Emory Colbert6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
3.64
Matthew Hayes
published
3.35
3.33
Kenneth Sallings
published
3.32
Fatima Zinober
published 3.5
3.20
Ken Patrick
published
3.15
Lorrie White
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Jennifer Hart
published
2.87
Danielle Lindblom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Lauren Constantine
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Constantine + Charles Constantine4348% games+7.8% vs expected
Matthew Hayes + Danielle Lindblom3357% gamesnot enough data
Lorrie White + Ken Patrick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charles Constantine
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
Matthew Hayes
17W–23L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
Kalicharan Durgampudi
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kenneth Sallings
24W–25L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Fatima Zinober
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Ken Patrick
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lorrie White
184W–124L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Jennifer Hart
10W–20L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Danielle Lindblom
93W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
Lauren Constantine
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.