Teams

LA - Team FEDAL

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-25vs LA - Victorious SecretWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelanie Truhett / Tamra Loeb vs Linda Tyrer / Sharona Malekan5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJenny Isaacson / Ruth McNulty vs Jennifer Doyle / Donna Sanders6-1, 6-1
2023-03-04vs LA - Canyon CoyotesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Evans / Melanie Truhett vs Michelle Fowler / Carla Denker7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGenevieve MacNamara / Ruth McNulty vs Shannon Hensley / Carolyn Sims6-2, 6-2
2023-02-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesVirginia Takeuchi / Nancy Bruyninx vs Hilary Dubin / Lauren Fritzinger6-0, 6-3
2023-02-04vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 02
L#1 DoublesVirginia Takeuchi / Christine Daniel vs Annik Bogharian / Marie Roco2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberley Walker / Melanie Truhett vs Sanaz Ossanloo / Dena Siegel3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesJill Evans / Melanie Truhett vs Yolanda Zackler / Sarah Kilpatrick5-7, 3-6
2023-01-22vs LA - Canyon CoyotesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie Truhett / Tamra Loeb vs Michelle Fowler / Nataliya Padilla6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Jenny Isaacson
published
3.59
Tamra Loeb
published
3.59
Melanie Truhett
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.42
Christine Daniel
published 3.5
3.20
Virginia Takeuchi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Ruth McNulty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Kimberley Walker
published
2.73
Genevieve MacNamara
published
Nancy Bruyninx
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tamra Loeb + Melanie Truhett11654% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenny Isaacson
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Tamra Loeb
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.59
4
Melanie Truhett
125W–106L career · 5 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Christine Daniel
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Virginia Takeuchi
112W–106L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Ruth McNulty
67W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Kimberley Walker
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
Genevieve MacNamara
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Nancy Bruyninx
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.