Teams

Western: Judi's Favs

2026 40&Over Women · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.93 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-08vs Sage/StohlSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNicole McKee / Missy Fitzharris vs Julie Cimorelli / Claudia Smolinski6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMaura McKenna-Rossow vs Samar Al-Alam6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJan Coleman / Nancy Wingerter vs Misty Kaminski / April Zolczer3-6, 5-6
L#3 DoublesNelida Sanchez / Carol Salvatore vs Alice Curtiss / Michelle Plimpton4-6, 3-6
2026-07-01vs Sage/StohlWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichele McGrath / Teresa Arena vs Dominica Sortisio / Misty Kaminski6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNicole McKee vs Samar Al-Alam6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRowena de Perio / Nancy Rehak vs Jane Early / Michelle Plimpton6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJean Jurek / Nancy Wingerter vs Amy Stohl / Alice Curtiss3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-24vs Sage/StohlWon 40
W#1 DoublesJill Belote / Elizabeth White vs Jane Early / April Zolczer6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNicole McKee vs Hope Ham6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaura McKenna-Rossow / Molly Connerton vs Alice Curtiss / Karen Genovese5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJan Coleman / Nelida Sanchez vs Joyce Monczynski / Julie Shapiro6-1, 6-4
2026-06-17vs Sage/StohlWon 40
W#1 DoublesMissy Fitzharris / Nancy Rehak vs Julie Cimorelli / June Brennan3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMolly Connerton vs Hope Ham6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJean Jurek / Rowena de Perio vs Melissa Dambrowski / Joyce Monczynski6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJan Coleman / Carol Salvatore vs Michelle Plimpton / Karen Genovese6-3, 6-0
2026-06-10vs Sage/StohlWon 40
W#1 DoublesTeresa Arena / Michele McGrath vs Jane Early / Claudia Smolinski6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarol Salvatore vs Hope Ham6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNancy Rehak / Jean Jurek vs Misty Kaminski / Dominica Sortisio6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesElizabeth White / Nelida Sanchez vs Melissa Dambrowski / Julie Shapiro6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Nicole McKee
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
Jill Belote
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Missy Fitzharris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Maura McKenna-Rossow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.81
Michele McGrath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Nancy Rehak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Carol Salvatore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.71
Jan Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Rowena de Perio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Nancy Wingerter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Teresa Arena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Molly Connerton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Jean Jurek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Elizabeth White
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Nelida Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Salvatore + Michele McGrath5262% games+9.1% vs expected
Nancy Rehak + Michele McGrath19460% games+5.4% vs expected
Carol Salvatore + Rowena de Perio9555% games+4.3% vs expected
Rowena de Perio + Michele McGrath12758% games+2.5% vs expected
Jan Coleman + Michele McGrath201056% games+1.9% vs expected
Carol Salvatore + Nancy Rehak3351% games+0.8% vs expected
Teresa Arena + Michele McGrath331955% games−2.3% vs expected
Nancy Rehak + Rowena de Perio15852% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole McKee
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Jill Belote
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Missy Fitzharris
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Maura McKenna-Rossow
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Michele McGrath
107W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Nancy Rehak
101W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carol Salvatore
83W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Jan Coleman
65W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Rowena de Perio
90W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Nancy Wingerter
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Teresa Arena
60W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Molly Connerton
73W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
Jean Jurek
29W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Elizabeth White
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Nelida Sanchez
122W–98L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.