Teams

LCStanford/River Run

2023 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-10vs LWMizicko/PeninsulaWon 31
L#1 DoublesBridgette Ashbrook / Amy Reyerson vs Melinda Little / Karen Cooper6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShelly Brock vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Schleck / Melora Driver vs Gail Quinlan / Maureen Swink6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCara Stanford / Susan Falcone vs Kathleen Galloway / Heidi Stoddard7-5, 6-2
2023-05-03vs LCRupp/Statesville CCWon 31
L#1 DoublesShelly Brock / Sheila Pensler vs Leah Terry / Cori Peters6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Ward vs Danielle Fowler6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Lyerly / Brooke Harris vs Lisa Bograd / Margaret Johnson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLauren Verlander / Penny Noyes vs Kristin Carvelli / Jean Resener6-2, 7-5
2023-04-26vs LKPO-Powell/WestportWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrooke Harris / Amy Ward vs Mali Robinson / Astrid Peterson7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJulie Lyerly vs Meagan Palmer6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBeth Schleck / Melora Driver vs Danielle Curwood / Sherilyn Dlugolenski2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKendrick Anderson / Penny Noyes vs Sheila Chast / Marilou Martin7-6, 6-2
2023-04-05vs LABarnett/Skybrook 3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesShelly Brock / Susan Falcone vs Amy Barnett / Nell Wilson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Ward vs Jaime Cooper - (DQ)6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Lyerly / Lauren Verlander vs Gay Thorne / Shannon Armstrong6-0, 6-3
2023-04-01vs LVMurray-Blixt/NMPWon 30
W#1 SinglesJulie Lyerly vs Lori Hoe6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCara Stanford / Kendrick Anderson vs Tracy Crouch / Carrie Rich6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBeth Schleck / Susan Falcone vs Katie Blixt / Suzy Wright6-1, 6-0
2023-03-29vs LLTU-Turley/JettonWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrooke Harris / Shelly Brock vs Christin Darnell / Jennifer Ashford4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Ward vs Laura Gottlieb6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Reyerson / Melora Driver vs Jodi Vose / Elize Houghton7-6, 7-6
2023-03-15vs LWMizicko/PeninsulaWon 40
W#1 DoublesLisa Gosling / Amy Reyerson vs Julie Moore / Patty Howe7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJulie Lyerly vs Heidi Stoddard6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSheila Pensler / Shelly Brock vs Gail Quinlan / Denise Streppa6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCara Stanford / Lauren Verlander vs Wendy Mizicko / Maureen Swink6-3, 6-2
2023-03-08vs LCRupp/Statesville CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Schleck / Susan Falcone vs Cori Peters / Danielle Fowler2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Ward vs Kristen Frame6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBridgette Ashbrook / Amy Reyerson vs Lisa Bograd / Sylvia Sullivan2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Amy Ward
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.33
Kendrick Anderson
published
3.30
Julie Lyerly
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.09
Lisa Gosling
published
3.06
Sheila Pensler
published
3.04
Beth Schleck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
3.00
Penny Noyes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Amy Reyerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Susan Falcone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Cara Stanford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Lauren Verlander
published
2.63
Shelly Brock
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Brock + Beth Schleck4354% gamesnot enough data
Penny Noyes + Amy Reyerson4257% gamesnot enough data
Shelly Brock + Susan Falcone5161% gamesnot enough data
Cara Stanford + Beth Schleck2352% gamesnot enough data
Beth Schleck + Susan Falcone224 matchesnot enough data
Cara Stanford + Susan Falcone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Ward
243W–97L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
Kendrick Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Julie Lyerly
82W–86L career · 11 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Lisa Gosling
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sheila Pensler
7W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Beth Schleck
92W–75L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Penny Noyes
28W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.00
3
Amy Reyerson
35W–33L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Susan Falcone
43W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Cara Stanford
78W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.86
Lauren Verlander
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Bridgette Ashbrook
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Shelly Brock
86W–88L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.