Teams

JBlack/MParker (Queens)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-07vs WParker/LClarke (Queens)Won 31
W#1 DoublesKrista Wainscott / Christina McWilliams vs Kaylyn Thompson / Becky Tennyson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnna Sharp vs Maggie Lawrence5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMeredith Sweeney vs Elizabeth McCombs1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCaroline Pickup / Amanda Patrocino vs Sanjana Sudhir / Kim Ezzo0-6, 2-6
2024-04-23vs ATaylor (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJulian Black / Chelse Stevens vs Brittany Simpson / Christine Kahm1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMeredith Sweeney vs Sarah Schweppe7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKrista Wainscott / Caroline Pickup vs Jennifer Krysinski / Vanessa Olson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-22vs KCochran/STo (Queens)Won 31
L#1 SinglesAnna Sharp vs Kim Cochran6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKrista Wainscott / Christina McWilliams vs Stefanie Reynolds / Monica Erb7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesChelse Stevens vs Sandra To6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmanda Patrocino / Meredith Sweeney vs Mindy Merchant / Lynn Hughes6-3, 6-0
2024-04-16vs CStaton (Park Road)Won 31
L#1 SinglesAnna Sharp vs Hannah Chillag6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Natwick / Caroline Pickup vs Cynthia Staton / Christine Kessel7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMeredith Sweeney vs Angela Stallman7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKrista Wainscott / Christina McWilliams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-02vs WParker/LClarke (Queens)Split 11
L#1 SinglesChelse Stevens vs Diana West1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesAnna Sharp vs Elizabeth McCombs6-0, 6-3
2024-03-19vs MAhern (Palisades CC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesAnna Sharp vs Lindsay Morrison7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHolly Natwick / Michelle Ziewacz vs Kindell Schmitt / Megan Hunter3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Patrocino / Meredith Sweeney vs Alexis Kaiser / Alison Lacy Sherrill6-4, 6-2
2024-03-12vs JGardiner (OPRC)Lost 13
W#1 SinglesAnna Sharp vs Eryn Ratcliffe5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Patrocino / Meredith Sweeney vs Jennifer Gardiner / Susan Jaffe6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChelse Stevens vs Tasha Sheehy1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Price / Beth Drossman vs Suzy Johnson / Debbie Titlestad1-6, 4-6
2024-03-10vs ATaylor (Park Road)Won 31
W#1 DoublesAmanda Patrocino / Meredith Sweeney vs Sarah Schweppe / Christine Kahm7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKrista Wainscott / Christina McWilliams vs Sophie Pollak / Vanessa Olson6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnna Sharp vs Madeline Weih7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Parker / Holly Natwick vs Sheila Walsh / Natalie Lombardi3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Anna Sharp
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.10
Amanda Patrocino
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
4.10
Ana Bolson
published 4.5
4.08
Caroline Pickup
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
4.07
Meredith Sweeney
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.93
3.93
Chelse Stevens
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 4
3.76
Beth Drossman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Krista Wainscott
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.70
Julian Black
published
3.68
Holly Natwick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Michelle Ziewacz
published
3.44
Mary Parker
published
Madeline Szuba
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meredith Sweeney + Amanda Patrocino9265% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Patrocino + Chelse Stevens5256% gamesnot enough data
Christina McWilliams + Krista Wainscott3261% gamesnot enough data
Holly Natwick + Caroline Pickup314 matchesnot enough data
Chelse Stevens + Caroline Pickup213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Sharp
62W–39L career · 7 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Amanda Patrocino
176W–39L career · 11 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Ana Bolson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
Caroline Pickup
245W–112L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
4.08
Meredith Sweeney
94W–52L career · 11 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.07
4
Christina McWilliams
26W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Chelse Stevens
136W–81L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Beth Drossman
62W–52L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Krista Wainscott
188W–89L career · 11 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Julian Black
32W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.70
4
Holly Natwick
85W–44L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.68
Michelle Ziewacz
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
Mary Parker
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Madeline Szuba
25W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.