← Teams

PTC-Stromquist

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jin Velasco
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.75
Angie Stromquist
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Michelle Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Parish Burns
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Reiko Maeda
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
May Graham
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Erin Casey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Miriam Habafy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Hilary Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
Nicole Floyd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-07-17Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesJin Velasco / Kaie Wellman vs Hong Huynh / Shannon Roarke7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMay Graham vs Suzanne Chambers6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesErin Casey / Miriam Habafy vs Kate Leatherbarrow / Mary Lowblad4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDar Dragoon / Michelle Johnson vs Heike Droste / Tina Prassas6-3, 7-5
2021-07-16Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesMichelle Johnson / Hilary Johnson vs Jeri Finn / Michelle Posey5-1
L#1 SinglesMay Graham vs Vickie Maletteri3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Kaie Wellman vs Nicolle Lochner / Wendy Hill7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDar Dragoon / Reiko Maeda vs Dana Petrusich / Kerri Patrick7-5, 6-1
2021-07-11Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Parish Burns vs Suzie Glenn / Jennie Brawn6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJin Velasco vs Michele Snyder6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMay Graham / Miriam Habafy vs Kathy Ramsey / Jennifer Woodard6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNicole Floyd / Carla Scott vs Julie Trujillo / Janice Ackley6-2, 6-1
2021-07-10Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesReiko Maeda / Kaie Wellman vs Terri Gotcher / Kim Hasle6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesParish Burns vs Bethany Bounds6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichelle Johnson / Hilary Johnson vs Julie Kim / Alexandra Lee6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelinda Baker / Nicole Floyd vs Alison Davis / Jill Eilers6-0, 6-3
2021-06-06Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesAngie Stromquist / Jin Velasco vs Sara Swanborn / Chrys Culver6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesReiko Maeda vs Joy Kolesnikoff7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesParish Burns / Erin Casey vs Karen Ohollaren / Lisa Barsotti6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDar Dragoon / Michelle Johnson vs Rebecca McMasters / Kim Christensen6-3, 6-4
2021-06-05Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesJin Velasco / Kaie Wellman vs Vivian Nguyen / Andrea Vicino6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMay Graham vs Mary Green-Zwemke6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesReiko Maeda / Miriam Habafy vs Michele Sutherland / Alison Marr6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNicole Floyd / Carla Scott vs Diana Blebea / Suki Birge7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Jin Velasco
69W–35L career
6%91%4%
3.75
4
Angie Stromquist
92W–47L career
1%98%0%
3.75
3.5
Michelle Johnson
82W–103L career
0%90%10%
3.45
3.5
Parish Burns
112W–58L career
0%98%2%
3.36
3.5
Reiko Maeda
76W–78L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
May Graham
89W–78L career
0%99%0%
3.29
3.5
Erin Casey
142W–91L career
0%99%1%
3.28
3.5
Miriam Habafy
105W–82L career
0%99%0%
3.26
3
Hilary Johnson
68W–64L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Nicole Floyd
35W–56L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.