Teams

Sizzling Sistahs

2022 Adult 55 and Over League · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-17vs Wells GalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBettina Haerer / Sonia Kreag vs Panna Cappelli / Pamela Henry2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartha Hecker / Susan Sato vs Carol Lam / Daphne Okamoto2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCynthia McLean-Feliciano / Karla Nutt vs Lore Lee Robello / Kristin Walker2-6, 1-6
2022-04-10vs Lahaina LobstersLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristina Haywood / Jan Bryan vs Valerie Giacomini / Celeste Abate3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKarla Nutt / Janet Davis vs Carole Anderson / Susan Bailey0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSonia Kreag / Cynthia McLean-Feliciano vs Nancy Cross / Joyce O'Hanlon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-09vs Wells GalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesCynthia Sawyer / Sonia Kreag vs Kristin Walker / Lore Lee Robello6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJan Bryan / Christina Haywood vs Panna Cappelli / Pamela Henry3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Sato / Anne Swift vs Ann Marugaki / Elise Moniz1-6, 3-6
2022-03-27vs Maui MagicWon 30
W#1 DoublesSonia Kreag / Cynthia McLean-Feliciano vs Diane Ho / Jane Sakakihara6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMartha Hecker / Susan Sato vs Linda Coleon / Sue Linder6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Swift / Mina Welch vs Diane Nagasaka / Darleen Ornellas6-1, 6-1
2022-03-26vs Wailea High FivesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJan Bryan / Christina Haywood vs Natalie Embree / M Beverly Rivers1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSonia Kreag / Mina Welch vs Barbara Grandon / Kathy Carovano6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Sawyer / Karla Nutt vs Mindy Armour / Tara Kasbergen6-4, 6-2
2022-03-19vs Lahaina LobstersLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Sato / Christina Haywood vs Nancy Cross / Valerie Giacomini6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCynthia Sawyer / Bettina Haerer vs Celeste Abate / Katy O'Leary4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarla Nutt / Mina Welch vs Barbara Skaggs / Joyce O'Hanlon7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-13vs Wailea High FivesLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristina Haywood / Mina Welch vs Natalie Embree / M Beverly Rivers4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJan Bryan / Martha Hecker vs Mindy Armour / Barbara Botkin1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Davis / Kathe Schindler vs Barbara Grandon / Gaela Prince3-6, 0-6
2022-03-05vs Maui MagicWon 21
W#1 DoublesJan Bryan / Bettina Haerer vs Sue Linder / Jane Sakakihara6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathe Schindler / Janet Davis vs Susan Miller / Linda Coleon2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Sato / Cynthia Sawyer vs Diane Nagasaka / Joanne Quintos6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wells Gals6216820192
2Wailea High Fives44131127202
3Sizzling Sistahs35101432223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bettina Haerer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.39
Karla Nutt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Cynthia Sawyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Mina Welch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Jan Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Christina Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Sonia Kreag
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.06
Anne Swift
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Janet Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Kathe Schindler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Martha Hecker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Sato
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Bryan + Cynthia Sawyer8158% games+8.8% vs expected
Christina Haywood + Karla Nutt3251% games+5.1% vs expected
Cynthia Sawyer + Susan Sato3354% games+0.6% vs expected
Christina Haywood + Susan Sato4547% games+0.4% vs expected
Jan Bryan + Karla Nutt3345% games−0.4% vs expected
Jan Bryan + Christina Haywood4743% games−3.9% vs expected
Christina Haywood + Mina Welch3643% games−5.0% vs expected
Christina Haywood + Cynthia Sawyer4251% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bettina Haerer
14W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Karla Nutt
102W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Cynthia Sawyer
56W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Mina Welch
33W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jan Bryan
51W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Christina Haywood
33W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Sonia Kreag
31W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Anne Swift
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
Janet Davis
41W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.03
Kathe Schindler
25W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Martha Hecker
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Sato
68W–65L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.