Teams

5 Westwood Wiz - Wisotzki

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 2.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-27vs 4 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 2.5Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJoshua Alloway vs Antonio Jones-Stamm6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesEzra Harmon vs Sam Taylor3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRicky Wong vs Mark Cullip7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-20vs 2 SCC Tri Lambs - PercyWon 20
W#2 SinglesKyle Strater vs John Troy Owens6-4, 7-5
W#3 SinglesMatthew Rose vs Barry Exley6-0, 6-1
2025-10-13vs 7 ACAC - RhodesWon 21
W#1 SinglesKyle Strater vs Bradford Rhodes7-6, 6-1
L#2 SinglesEzra Harmon vs Hamilton Bryan0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMatthew Rose vs TJ Rhone6-4, 6-2
2025-10-06vs 1 WW Ace Holes - WalekLost 03
L#1 SinglesGordon Wisotzki vs Connor Rust7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJoshua Alloway vs Stephen Demella1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesPatrick Lloyd vs Edward Barlow2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Nord vs Malik Mathews3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesPatrick Lloyd vs Eric Meadows6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesGordon Wisotzki vs Adonis Salinas6-1, 6-0
2025-09-22vs 8 Lakeside Club - King 2.5Won 20
W#2 SinglesGordon Wisotzki vs Jon Markham6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesPatrick Lloyd vs Joshua Bartels6-4, 7-5
2025-09-15vs 6 Kanawha Crushers - CarpenterLost 03
L#1 SinglesEzra Harmon vs Patrick Harding0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJoshua Alloway vs Casey Whittaker4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesRicky Wong vs Barry Haneberg1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Kyle Strater
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.67
Gordon Wisotzki
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.46
Joshua Alloway
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.32
Patrick Lloyd
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.17
Ezra Harmon
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.16
Ryan Nord
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.12
Ricky Wong
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Matthew Rose
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gordon Wisotzki + Kyle Strater213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Strater
22W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.76
Gordon Wisotzki
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Joshua Alloway
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Patrick Lloyd
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Ezra Harmon
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Ryan Nord
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Ricky Wong
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Matthew Rose
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.