Teams

Peschel Summer 65

2025 ADULT 65 & OVER SUMMER · 8.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesMark Peschel / Peter Vujovich vs James Jerdee / Chris Shol6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRon Ingalls / Richard Keller vs Steven Siegel / Reg Dunlap5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLee Felicetta / Jeffrey Moe vs John Genz / Bradley Springer1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesRichard Keller / Mark Peschel vs Chris Shol / Kirk Spresser2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Moe / Peter Vujovich vs Bill Henney / Bradley Springer6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLee Felicetta / Mark Norlander vs David Baumgardner / Paul Dalton4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesRon Ingalls / Gregory Vanheest vs Joel Haggerty / John Olwell6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBryan Ball / Jeffrey Moe vs David Baumgardner / John Genz2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLee Felicetta / Lonny Wittnebel vs Reg Dunlap / Bill Henney4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesGregory Vanheest / Jeffrey Moe vs Steven Siegel / Bill Sommers2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBryan Ball / Lee Felicetta vs John Olwell / Joel Haggerty6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Vujovich / Lonny Wittnebel vs John Genz / David Baumgardner4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Bryan Ball
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Lonny Wittnebel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gregory Vanheest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jeffrey Moe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Lee Felicetta
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mark Norlander
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Peschel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Vujovich
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Keller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ron Ingalls
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Peschel + Peter Vujovich2348% gamesnot enough data
Richard Keller + Mark Peschel033 matchesnot enough data
Peter Vujovich + Jeffrey Moe303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Ball
4W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
Lonny Wittnebel
20W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Gregory Vanheest
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Moe
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lee Felicetta
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Norlander
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mark Peschel
3W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Vujovich
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Keller
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ron Ingalls
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.