Teams

Jeffreys, John

2026 Adult 18 & Over-JXN · Men 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-09vs Thorne, LeeWon 32
W#1 DoublesHayden Perkins / Baley Reed vs Walker Roberts / Weldon Doe6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrendon Mcleod vs Dillon King6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJace Correro / Webb Strickland vs Tyler Walker / Kyle Jones4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Jeffreys vs Peter Mills3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeffery Richburg / Miles Huff vs Dean Arnold / Will Herrin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-02vs Smith, NathanWon 32
W#1 DoublesHayden Perkins / Brendon Mcleod vs Jaye Germany / Kenny Pilgrim6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesWebb Strickland vs Walker Neal3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJace Correro / David Mason vs Tyler Lantz / Michael Barnard3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Jeffreys vs Gage Rodriguez1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBaley Reed / Christopher Russell vs Robbie Holt / Nathan Smith6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-26vs Starnes, SylvanWon 31
W#1 DoublesHayden Perkins / David Mason vs Christopher Thompson / Jack Sims6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMiles Huff vs Avigyan Sengupta2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBaley Reed / Jeffery Richburg vs Troy Stokes / Zachary McIntyre6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesWebb Strickland vs Holden Pitre6-2, 6-0
2026-03-19vs Sherrod, DeAngeloLost 04
L#1 DoublesWebb Strickland / John Jeffreys vs Matthew Weeks / James Johnson4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBrendon Mcleod vs Ian Kimball1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHayden Perkins / Jace Correro vs Caleb Foxworth / Joseph Dendy1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeffery Richburg / Christopher Russell vs Julius Gladney / DeAngelo Sherrod0-6, 4-6
2026-02-26vs Thorne, LeeLost 04
L#1 DoublesJace Correro / Baley Reed vs Tyler Walker / Weldon Doe6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJohn Jeffreys vs Dean Arnold3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJeffery Richburg / Christopher Russell vs Will Herrin / Peter Mills2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHayden Perkins vs Christopher Loftin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-19vs Smith, NathanWon 32
W#1 DoublesHayden Perkins / Christopher Russell vs Edward Resch / Jaye Germany6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJohn Jeffreys vs Tyler Lantz6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJace Correro / Brendon Mcleod vs Nathan Smith / Seth Thompson6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesWebb Strickland vs Derrick Jones3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBaley Reed / David Mason vs Michael Barnard / Wes Price3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-12vs Starnes, SylvanWon 32
W#1 DoublesHayden Perkins / Christopher Russell vs Christopher Thompson / Micah Thomas6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJohn Jeffreys vs Avigyan Sengupta1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeffery Richburg / Miles Huff vs Holden Pitre / Zachary McIntyre6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesWebb Strickland vs Jack Sims6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBaley Reed / David Mason vs Sylvan Starnes / Aidan Topakoglu7-5, 6-3
2026-02-05vs Sherrod, DeAngeloLost 14
L#1 DoublesMiles Huff / Jace Correro vs James Johnson / Stephen Baldwyn2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Jeffreys vs Darrell Ward7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrendon Mcleod / Jeffery Richburg vs Abram Diaz / DeAngelo Sherrod2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesWebb Strickland vs Joseph Dendy3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHayden Perkins / Baley Reed vs Joseph Boler / Blair Williamson5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sherrod, DeAngelo7135513207
2Thorne, Lee53221844340
3Jeffreys, John53172350350
4Starnes, Sylvan08112963424

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Hayden Perkins
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
2.85
John Jeffreys
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.74
Webb Strickland
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
2.69
Jace Correro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.68
Baley Reed
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Miles Huff
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.60
Jeffery Richburg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Christopher Russell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.51
Brendon Mcleod
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayden Perkins + John Jeffreys303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hayden Perkins
14W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.08
John Jeffreys
16W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Webb Strickland
3W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Jace Correro
2W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Baley Reed
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Miles Huff
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Jeffery Richburg
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Christopher Russell
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.54
2.5
Brendon Mcleod
6W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.