Teams

CDTA S 18&OM4.5 5.WSC Reimers Sat 4 $20

1Summer 18&O WN · WE

15 players · average NTRP 4.36 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesMasanori Suzuki vs Larry Liu6-3, 4-5
W#1 DoublesPeter Itskovich / Michael Yong vs Andrew Snyder / Nick Werth6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMasanori Suzuki vs Jacob Lazarus6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWalker Nodine / Joshua Luetkehans vs Russell Needler / Danny Santaromita6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMichael Yong / Travis Reimers vs Brian Ayala Victoria / Robert Legg7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMasanori Suzuki vs Max Crouse1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesErik Halperin / Adam Buckley vs Max Soghikian / Ian Barr6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesTravis Reimers / Zsolt Juhasz vs Brian Sorich / Connor Harmon4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdam Buckley / Joshua Luetkehans vs Kevin Zimmerman / Oscar Moncau6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesKevin Kamenjarin / Peter Itskovich vs Peter Shields / Jonathan Diamond6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesZsolt Juhasz / Joe Grant vs Nhan Tran / Hans-Joerg Engler6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMasanori Suzuki vs Akshay Mehrotra6-7, 5-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM4.5 6.RT Tranter Sun 10 $2751191127253
2CDTA S 18&OM4.5 5.WSC Reimers Sat 4 $204222819149
3CDTA S 18&OM4.5 7.NTC Schmidt Wed 7 $2442201026227
4CDTA S 18&OM4.5 2.MTC Brown Sat 3 $33.542171331215
5CDTA S 18&OM4.5 4.Wave(OUT) Shmigelsky Sun 7 $1224121840302
6CDTA S 18&OM4.5 1.Tam Liu Sat 11 $2224102043291
7CDTA S 18&OM4.5 3.Tam Needler Sun 5 $220652551332

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Adam Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.44
Kevin Kamenjarin
published 4.5
4.42
Zsolt Juhasz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.41
Joshua Luetkehans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Jeffrey Struck
published 4.5
4.29
Travis Reimers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.28
Rod Wienke
published 4.5
4.25
Erik Halperin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Peter Itskovich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Masanori Suzuki
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.13
Joe Grant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Mark Exner
published
4.00
Walker Nodine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Reid Bertsche
published 4
3.97
Andrew Witt
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Luetkehans + Mark Exner5158% gamesnot enough data
Erik Halperin + Mark Exner4256% gamesnot enough data
Zsolt Juhasz + Travis Reimers4254% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Zsolt Juhasz4160% gamesnot enough data
Rod Wienke + Andrew Witt224 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Erik Halperin134 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Travis Reimers314 matchesnot enough data
Erik Halperin + Kevin Kamenjarin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adam Buckley
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.58
4.5
Kevin Kamenjarin
68W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.44
Zsolt Juhasz
50W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
4.42
Joshua Luetkehans
56W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Jeffrey Struck
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.29
Travis Reimers
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Rod Wienke
120W–73L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Erik Halperin
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
Peter Itskovich
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Masanori Suzuki
54W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
4.15
Joe Grant
38W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.13
Mark Exner
74W–54L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
Walker Nodine
41W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Reid Bertsche
45W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.98
4
Andrew Witt
24W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.