Teams

Suzee's Smashers

2025 18&Over Women Fall · 2.5

5 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-15vs Monmouth: Victorious SecretLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrindha Kodlapur vs Videsha Joshi0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBonnie Russo / Diana Voshchinsky vs Sharon Palazzo / Lisa Prevette1-6, 1-6
2024-11-08vs Monmouth: Victorious SecretSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBonnie Russo / Pamela Poole vs Kara Zlotnick / Dawn Kopp3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBrindha Kodlapur vs Sharon Palazzo7-5, 6-1
2024-11-01vs Monmouth: Victorious SecretLost 02
L#1 DoublesBonnie Russo / Pamela Poole vs Sharon Palazzo / Lisa Prevette2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJulie Burg vs Kara Zlotnick2-6, 3-6
2024-10-25vs Monmouth: Victorious SecretWon 10
W#2 DoublesLori Littenberg / Kristen Barbara vs Francesca Matassa / Shachee Pandya6-3, 7-5
2024-10-18vs Monmouth: Victorious SecretWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Littenberg / Kristen Barbara vs Suzanne Greco / Sandra Sackowitz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBonnie Russo / Jan Seaman vs Lisa Prevette / Rachel Poritz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-13vs Monmouth: Victorious SecretLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrindha Kodlapur vs Videsha Joshi3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Littenberg / Bonnie Russo vs Shruti Kumari Panwar / Shachee Pandya6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-04vs Monmouth: Victorious SecretSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJulie Burg vs Sharon Palazzo0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Littenberg / Bonnie Russo vs Sharon Coleman / Susan Pino7-5, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Monmouth: Victorious Secret7119512123
2Suzee's Smashers1751940268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Brindha Kodlapur
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.29
Bonnie Russo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Julie Burg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lori Littenberg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Suzee Krebs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Russo + Lori Littenberg2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brindha Kodlapur
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
2.5
Bonnie Russo
13W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Julie Burg
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lori Littenberg
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzee Krebs
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.