Teams

2025 WI Combo 7.5W NEL GBTC Kelly

2025 WI Combo · WI Combo 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesDorothy Deans / Stacy Vossberg vs Danielle Morris / Kaylee Graefe2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRhonda Danahar / Paula Christensen vs Valerie Narveson / Emily Anderson0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJulie van Saders / Rocky Calawerts vs Imelda Fisher / Taylor Lackey6-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDorothy Deans / Stacy Vossberg vs Danielle Morris / Valerie Narveson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRhonda Danahar / Lindsey Donahue vs Emily Anderson / Kaylee Graefe6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Lambert-Tease / Kim Perna vs Imelda Fisher / Taylor Lackey7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesDorothy Deans / Stacy Vossberg vs Allyson Verbauwhede / Chelsea Watry2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Fencl / Lindsey Donahue vs Sydney Verbauwhede / Julie Kowalkowski3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJulie van Saders / Rocky Calawerts vs Kaitlyn Jonen / Karin Adams1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDorothy Deans / Stacy Vossberg vs Sydney Verbauwhede / Chelsea Watry2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Fencl / Paula Christensen vs Allyson Verbauwhede / Julie Kowalkowski4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Kelly / Lori Monette vs Cherie Yenchesky / Kaitlyn Jonen1-6, 0-6
2026-01-09vs 2025 WI Combo 7.5W NEL travel JakuszSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie van Saders / Lori Monette vs Leah Herdrich / Tara Cooper0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Fencl / Paula Christensen vs Michele O Donnell / Kari Worzella6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesRocky Calawerts / Kathy Kelly vs Leah Herdrich / Tara Cooper1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDorothy Deans / Stacy Vossberg vs Michele O Donnell / Kari Worzella5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRhonda Danahar / Kim Perna vs Nichole Matowitz / Kristin Marquard4-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesDorothy Deans / Stacy Vossberg vs Tara Sherman / Amy Buege6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRocky Calawerts / Lindsey Donahue vs Amy Manders / Rachel Sawall1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Lambert-Tease / Kim Perna vs Tracy Mitchell / Patricia Lison-Sheikh2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesRhonda Danahar / Karen Maloney vs Rachel Sawall / Sheila Butrym6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPaula Christensen / Kathy Kelly vs Heidi Gallagher / Rosario Clifford6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie van Saders / Lori Monette vs Amy Buege / Tara Sherman2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dorothy Deans
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.53
Rhonda Danahar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.27
Karen Maloney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Paula Christensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Lori Monette
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Lindsey Donahue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Stacy Vossberg
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.02
Julie van Saders
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Susan Lambert-Tease
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Rocky Calawerts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kim Perna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Fencl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie van Saders + Rocky Calawerts3644% games+7.0% vs expected
Lori Monette + Julie van Saders2643% games+5.8% vs expected
Karen Maloney + Rocky Calawerts5844% games−0.7% vs expected
Dorothy Deans + Stacy Vossberg2441% gamesnot enough data
Lori Monette + Rocky Calawerts224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Maloney + Julie van Saders224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Lambert-Tease + Rocky Calawerts224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Maloney + Stacy Vossberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dorothy Deans
2W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhonda Danahar
15W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Karen Maloney
43W–40L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Paula Christensen
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Lori Monette
16W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Lindsey Donahue
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
Stacy Vossberg
6W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Julie van Saders
17W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Susan Lambert-Tease
5W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Rocky Calawerts
16W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Kim Perna
35W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristin Fencl
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.