Teams

4S:Havin' a Ball!:Ferguson/Sargeantson

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over COMBO (Women) - Fall · 5.5 Women - 1

16 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesDeirdre Fletcher / Alisa Dror vs Christina Spizzirri / Kimberly Grosso4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Knapp / Katie Sullivan vs Sarah Richardson / Loralie Held0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Weber / Lorraine Catalano vs Maude Ancone / Judy Dalaker5-7, 4-5
2025-11-22vs 4S: Combo 5.5: DebnathLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Weber / Andrea Calabrese vs Shannon Wten / Lori Barshop2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDeirdre Fletcher / Meg Maise vs Nixali Zvezdin / Anna Hertzman7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-11-08vs 4S: Combo 5.5: DebnathLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Knapp / Meg Maise vs Shannon Wten / Anna Hertzman0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesValerie de Stefanis / Andrea Calabrese vs Jessie Knopp / Katy Lockhart7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNora King / Kimberly Fox vs Emma Paradis / Michele Conklin4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesDonna Sargeantson / Lorraine Catalano vs Christina Spizzirri / Nancy Day3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesValerie de Stefanis / Kathy Reale vs Paige Couture / Kimberly Grosso6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Sullivan / Meg Maise vs Deborah Nicolson / Loralie Held1-6, 1-6
2025-10-04vs 4S: Combo 5.5: DebnathSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonna Sargeantson / Andrea Calabrese vs Emi Mills / Meagan Brody1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Murphy / Meg Maise vs Jessie Knopp / Pallavi Debnath6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKatie Ferguson / Alisa Dror vs Melissa Salvatore / Astrid Alvarez Clavijo3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesValerie de Stefanis / Kimberly Fox vs Christina Mink / Tara Donnelly4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Knapp / Kathy Reale vs Suzanne Bartek / Tami Siriwardene6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.5 Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TRC: Serve It Up:Spizzirri/Richardson0613513132
24S: Combo 5.5: Debnath069922153
34S:Havin' a Ball!:Ferguson/Sargeantson0651329195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Weber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Nancy Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Andrea Calabrese
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Donna Sargeantson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Lorraine Catalano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Alisa Dror
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Kathy Knapp
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Nancy Zangre
published
2.35
Deirdre Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.26
Valerie de Stefanis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.21
Kathy Reale
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
1.87
Meg Maise
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Katie Ferguson
published
Katie Sullivan
published
Kimberly Fox
published
Nora King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Sargeantson + Andrea Calabrese4355% games+5.5% vs expected
Nancy Zangre + Lorraine Catalano3840% games−1.6% vs expected
Valerie de Stefanis + Lorraine Catalano2450% gamesnot enough data
Donna Sargeantson + Lorraine Catalano0536% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Zangre + Valerie de Stefanis044 matchesnot enough data
Valerie de Stefanis + Kimberly Fox224 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Reale + Kathy Knapp213 matchesnot enough data
Alisa Dror + Andrea Calabrese213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Weber
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Murphy
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Andrea Calabrese
14W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
3
Donna Sargeantson
26W–55L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Lorraine Catalano
18W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.46
3
Alisa Dror
22W–24L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45
Kathy Knapp
12W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Nancy Zangre
10W–31L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Deirdre Fletcher
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
Valerie de Stefanis
24W–61L career · 6 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.26
Kathy Reale
18W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Meg Maise
3W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Katie Ferguson
12W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Sullivan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Fox
16W–30L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nora King
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.