Teams

Sp.Johnson18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-30vs Na.Wireback18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSpencer Johnson vs Taylor Atherton6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesHanzhang Liu vs Sheldon Roberts3-6, 0-6
2026-07-15vs Ca.Pena18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesSpencer Johnson vs Scott Underwood3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesHanzhang Liu vs Clifton Minsley0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesStephen Marley vs Pablo Koe-Krompecher4-6, 3-6
2026-07-02vs Ry.Sheppard18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesStephen Marley vs Jeron Russell2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHanzhang Liu vs Gabriel Iocco0-6, 1-6
2026-06-25vs Na.Wireback18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAustin Ness vs Andrew Chan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesStephen Marley vs Sheldon Roberts1-6, 3-6
2026-06-11vs Ma.Roschel18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesSpencer Johnson vs Nick Martinelli4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAusten Berry vs Marcelo Roschel6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesHanzhang Liu vs Chris Wandor3-6, 1-6
2026-06-05vs Ca.Pena18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesAusten Berry vs Clifton Minsley6-1, 7-6
2026-05-28vs Ry.Sheppard18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesAusten Berry vs Matthew Glenn0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSpencer Johnson vs Ryan Sheppard2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAustin Ness vs Scott Scarneo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ry.Sheppard18S6117412149
2Ca.Pena18S4313817158
3Na.Wireback18S3371124167
4Sp.Johnson18S2461227182
5Ma.Roschel18S1551326180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Spencer Johnson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.86
Austen Berry
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.70
Austin Ness
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.58
Stephen Marley
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.12
Hanzhang Liu
usually #3 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Spencer Johnson
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Austen Berry
2W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Austin Ness
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Stephen Marley
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Hanzhang Liu
3W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.