Teams

Pena Castro - Ball too well

2026 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 7 played
Sep 17 9:00 PM
Norbeck Country Club
2026-08-26vs Dennis - Singles LadiesWon 20
W#1 SinglesLily Kosegarten vs Terri Esterowitz6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCaitlin Lee vs Stacy Stratton6-2, 6-0
2026-08-19vs Dennis - Singles LadiesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAna Maria Pena Castro vs Terri Esterowitz2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCaitlin Lee vs Chloe Snook6-1, 6-2
2026-08-15vs Dennis - Singles LadiesWon 21
W#1 SinglesLily Kosegarten vs Chloe Snook6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesRuchi Nanda vs Jenna Gietl4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKim Dowd vs Stacy Stratton6-1, 6-4
2026-08-11vs Dennis - Singles LadiesLost 12
W#1 SinglesLily Kosegarten vs Jennifer Cullum6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesCaitlin Lee vs Terri Esterowitz4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKim Dowd vs Chloe Snook3-6, 2-6
2026-08-05vs Dennis - Singles LadiesLost 12
L#1 SinglesKim Dowd vs Jenna Gietl4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAna Maria Pena Castro vs Kelly Dennis1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesYiziying Chen vs Chloe Snook6-1, 6-2
2026-07-28vs Dennis - Singles LadiesLost 12
L#1 SinglesRuchi Nanda vs Jenna Gietl1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesYiziying Chen vs Chloe Snook6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMary Arrington vs Stacy Stratton4-6, 1-6
2026-07-09vs Dennis - Singles LadiesLost 02
L#1 SinglesYiziying Chen vs Kelly Dennis0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesKayley Duval vs Jennifer Cullum1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Montgomery Singles 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dennis - Singles Ladies329614109
2Pena Castro - Ball too well236918119

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Caitlin Lee
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.41
Lily Kosegarten
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.29
Ana Maria Pena Castro
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Yiziying Chen
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Michele Brammer
published
4.17
Kanika Sabor
published 4.5
4.09
Ruchi Nanda
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.03
Kim Dowd
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.93
Kayley Duval
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Mary Arrington
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caitlin Lee
13W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.52
Lily Kosegarten
16W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Ana Maria Pena Castro
43W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Yiziying Chen
72W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
Michele Brammer
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Kanika Sabor
128W–50L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
Ruchi Nanda
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.09
Kim Dowd
22W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Kayley Duval
6W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.93
Mary Arrington
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.