Teams

Valle Lindo Volleygirls

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-29vs V-LLW Sunset Aces - ValentinoLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacy Ball / Carolina Britt vs JANE HUANG / Callie Paranick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-14vs Sunset Hills Love AllWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacy Ball / Judith Cade vs Suzanne Plotkin / Debbie Tuttle6-3, 6-2
2025-06-08vs Malibu MavericksLost 01
L#1 SinglesStacy Ball vs Mia Skelton2-6, 2-6
2025-06-07vs Royal Court JestersWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacy Ball / Debra Myrent vs Gizelda Parr / Kathryn Pisaro6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Carolina Britt
published 3
2.98
Van Stephenson
published
2.93
Stacy Ball
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
2.78
2.74
Anne Renard
published 3
2.72
Debra Myrent
published 3
2.72
Mary Stone
published
2.66
Judith Cade
published
2.65
2.64
Esther Lopez
published
2.63
Carol Goldreyer
published 3
2.62
Pamela Wax-Semus
published
2.39
Janet Chandler
published
Nicola Grun
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Stone + Janet Chandler213 matchesnot enough data
Debra Myrent + Anne Renard213 matchesnot enough data
Esther Lopez + Pamela Wax-Semus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carolina Britt
23W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Van Stephenson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Stacy Ball
131W–150L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Akshatha Gangadhar
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Teresa Amescua-Smith
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Anne Renard
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Debra Myrent
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Mary Stone
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Judith Cade
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
Roxane Beigel-coryell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Esther Lopez
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
3
Carol Goldreyer
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Pamela Wax-Semus
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Janet Chandler
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Nicola Grun
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.