← Teams

CP-Serendipity @CPWong

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-18vs BC-LeahyWon 4–0
W#1 DoublesDana Laursen / Elaine Loong vs Anne Bentley / Lesley McGovern6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Graves vs Sarah Leclercq6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLynda Carlson / Kaylee Nilan vs Bonnie Currey / Susan Blakey6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesConstance Essinger / Wendy Reynolds vs Lauren Leahy / Ann Waltier6-3, 7-6
2021-04-10vs RTC-SimmondsWon 4–0
W#1 DoublesDana Laursen / Elizabeth Graves vs Yoon Joo Han / Jacky Grotle6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCherry Ching vs Juli Rasmussen6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKimberly Wong / Hedi Carpenter vs Robin Aronson / Kelly Chiang6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaylee Nilan / Sandra Gurtler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-02vs STC-BlackWon 4–0
W#1 DoublesDana Laursen / Wendy Reynolds vs Becca Tessin / Patricia Brooke7-6, 4-3
W#1 SinglesCherry Ching vs Alison Winfield1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHedi Carpenter / Kimberly Wong vs Stephanie True / Wendy Laird6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLili Chang / Elaine Loong vs Stacie Feinstein / Anne Phelps6-0, 6-1
2021-03-27vs EDG-WilsonSplit 2–2
L#1 DoublesDana Laursen / Kimberly Wong vs Qi Geng / Nelly Ketefian2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Graves vs Seonyoon Ko6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCherry Ching / Elaine Loong vs Lainie Dickson / Carla Talich6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKaylee Nilan / Marcia Chapman vs Carmen Pong / Gina Jones7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2021-03-21vs RBW-String Theory-WilliamsLost 0–4
L#1 DoublesLynda Carlson / Linda la Cava vs Jennifer Chu / Margaret Russ0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Graves vs Lisa Vold3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesConstance Essinger / Marcia Chapman vs Elena Ivanova / Dawn Williams2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaylee Nilan / Sandra Gurtler vs Maren Gibson / Kristine Kleinsmith0-6, 3-6
2021-03-06vs BETC-WuSplit 2–2
W#1 DoublesKimberly Wong / Hedi Carpenter vs Jill Wakefield / Ruthann Nelson6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCherry Ching vs Becky Crain6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Reynolds / Lili Chang vs Juliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda la Cava / Lynda Carlson vs Leah Carroll / Martha Shefveland6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings36 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RBW-String Theory-Williams0618613131
2AYTC-Double Shots-Zakahi0618617176
3CP-Serendipity @CPWong0616817170
4BAIN-Hawley0616819193
5PSC-Lu0691526218
6TCSP-Sharks-Tarte06141026215
7BETC-Wu06121228226
8HBSQ-Donnelly06111328225
9BC-Leahy0691531237
10RTC-Simmonds06111331233
11BETC-Porter/Ikeda0681634247
12ETC-Slice Girls-Landry/Navarro0681636260
13STC-Black0642039250
14BC-Bloch0724412169
15ETC-Buck Wild0722615185
16TCSP-Vo0723515183
17CP-Darrow Back (Again) in Black07181020201
18BC-Haba/Anderson0719922219
19ETC-Smash-Reudink07171123207
20RBW-Schultz07141426240
21CAC/SL-D’Terminators-Morrison07171127221
22FC-Price07181027227
23PSC-Azure-Petriuc07161228237
24BTA-R.Day07181028238
25FC-Smith07151333250
26PL-Preciado07131533245
27MC W 3.0-Jay07131533258
28EDG-Keller07121637274
29IND-McCaslin0791938275
30TCSP-Terminetters-Bienhoff07111738294
31AYTC-Team Golden0791938289
32BC-Ball Crushers-Tursa07101839292
33TCSP-Lusty/Lu0782041292
34CAC/SL-Dynamite-Yang0791941287
35CP-Ottesen0772144302
36IND-Vogel0762246297

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Cherry Ching
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Kimberly Wong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Dana Laursen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Wendy Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Hedi Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Elizabeth Graves
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Lili Chang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Linda la Cava
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Kaylee Nilan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Elaine Loong
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Marcia Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Lynda Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Constance Essinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Sandra Gurtler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Wong + Hedi Carpenter7–163% games+9.5% vs expected
Dana Laursen + Elizabeth Graves4–355% games+2.4% vs expected
Dana Laursen + Wendy Reynolds3–343% games+1.8% vs expected
Lili Chang + Elaine Loong37–1660% games+1.5% vs expected
Kimberly Wong + Wendy Reynolds9–460% games+1.1% vs expected
Linda la Cava + Lynda Carlson14–1949% games−0.8% vs expected
Marcia Chapman + Kaylee Nilan8–1548% games−2.0% vs expected
Kaylee Nilan + Constance Essinger12–1948% games−4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cherry Ching
100W–41L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3
Kimberly Wong
85W–73L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%3%97%
3.24
3
Dana Laursen
70W–64L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
2.98
3.5
Wendy Reynolds
89W–69L career · 3 lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Hedi Carpenter
37W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Elizabeth Graves
38W–42L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
2.85
3
Lili Chang
62W–43L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Linda la Cava
53W–40L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
—
3
Kaylee Nilan
47W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Elaine Loong
52W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.54
3
Marcia Chapman
25W–41L career · 2 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Lynda Carlson
43W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Constance Essinger
38W–60L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.45
—
Sandra Gurtler
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.