Teams

RCC GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-29vs LTA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Ronacher / Jill Nelson vs Patty Orban / Jackye Whalen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristine Foulk / Diane Misgen vs Jan DeBruin / Sandy Wheaton6-3, 6-2
2022-06-22vs MEA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesRondi Herman / Melissa Ronacher vs Debbe Welsh / Joan Bleacher6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLisa Highley / Patricia Sato vs Janice Jeffryes / Marty Kinsley6-1, 6-0
2022-06-15vs BTA YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelissa Ronacher / Rondi Herman vs Nadine Wolff / Michelle Fredson7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJeanne Vonachen / Patricia Sato vs Pat Burgener / Ruth Henderson4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Sands / Cindy Ronlov vs Janice Cook / Laurie Leinonen7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2022-06-15vs CVTA REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Christine Lewis / Ruth Becker6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristine Foulk / Diane Misgen vs Terry Tessier / Carol Adams6-2, 6-3
2022-06-08vs LAC REDSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDiane Misgen / Barbara Sands vs Amy Paterra / Susan Haley6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Sato / Lisa Highley vs Joanne Aschenbrenner / Susan Rasmussen4-6, 4-6
2022-05-25vs LTA BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Mary Ellen O'Rell / Kathleen Sargent6-0, 6-4
2022-05-18vs MEA BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Lisa Highley vs Lisa Andren-Peterson / Debbe Welsh6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristine Foulk / Melissa Ronacher vs Mary Schubert / Janice Jeffryes6-2, 6-4
2022-05-11vs CVTA REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Jeanne Vonachen vs Tammy Lowery / Carmen Gunn6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Highley / Jill Nelson vs Beth Marvel / Sally Vander Veer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-04vs LAC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRondi Herman / Lisa Highley vs Sally O'Dell / Julie Benson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Deborah Stoner / Odile Lynch6-3, 6-3
2022-04-27vs BTA YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanice Bailey / Cindy Ronlov vs Janice Cook / Nadine Wolff6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Ronacher / Rondi Herman vs Ruth Henderson / Laurie Leinonen6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Janice Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Lisa Highley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Cindy Ronlov
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Melissa Ronacher
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Diane Misgen
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.06
Pamela Subry
published
Barbara Sands
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeanne Vonachen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristine Foulk
published
Nancy Borg
published
Patricia Sato
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rondi Herman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Vonachen + Janice Bailey7365% games+10.2% vs expected
Patricia Sato + Diane Misgen6354% games+5.3% vs expected
Cindy Ronlov + Janice Bailey552858% games−0.3% vs expected
Cindy Ronlov + Diane Misgen8450% games−0.7% vs expected
Lisa Highley + Janice Bailey4254% games−0.7% vs expected
Lisa Highley + Diane Misgen3541% games−7.5% vs expected
Rondi Herman + Lisa Highley0540% games−14.1% vs expected
Kristine Foulk + Lisa Highley1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Janice Bailey
95W–55L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Lisa Highley
71W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cindy Ronlov
112W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Melissa Ronacher
42W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Diane Misgen
83W–75L career · 11 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Pamela Subry
14W–25L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Barbara Sands
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jeanne Vonachen
19W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kristine Foulk
8W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Borg
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Sato
32W–32L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rondi Herman
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.