Teams

KY/SOM/STENGER

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & Over · 6.0 MIXED

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-08vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChaz McGuire / Olivia Matlin vs Brian Vinsant / Jenny Tharp1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Paulson / Sandy Paulson vs Gary Coffey / Lisette Garrett6-2, 6-3
2026-08-07vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSLost 02
L#1 DoublesThad Stenger / Olivia Matlin vs Brian Vinsant / Nancy Whitis6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElijah Adkisson / Amanda Webb vs Ken Tharp / JERI English6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-06vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPhilip Nunn / Olivia Matlin vs Ken Tharp / Nancy Whitis6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChaz McGuire / Sandy Paulson vs Gary Coffey / Lisette Garrett6-3, 6-4
2026-08-01vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSLost 12
L#1 DoublesPhilip Nunn / Olivia Matlin vs Gary Coffey / Lisette Garrett6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElijah Adkisson / Amanda Webb vs Brian Vinsant / JERI English2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChaz McGuire / Sandy Paulson vs Ken Tharp / Jenny Tharp6-2, 7-5
2026-07-31vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSWon 21
W#1 DoublesThad Stenger / Olivia Matlin vs Ken Tharp / Jenny Tharp6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Paulson / Sandy Paulson vs Adam Colter / Lisette Garrett6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBlake Lemon / Amanda Webb vs Ron Andrew / JERI English6-4, 6-4
2026-07-30vs KY/SOM/WILLIAMSLost 12
L#1 DoublesChaz McGuire / Olivia Matlin vs Brian Vinsant / JERI English7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Paulson / Sandy Paulson vs Ron Andrew / Lisette Garrett6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBlake Lemon / Amanda Webb vs Adam Colter / Nancy Whitis0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Olivia Matlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Sandy Paulson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Philip Nunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Thad Stenger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Amanda Webb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.38
Chaz McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Blake Lemon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elijah Adkisson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Olivia Matlin
2W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
Sandy Paulson
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Philip Nunn
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.77
Thad Stenger
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Amanda Webb
1W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Chaz McGuire
2W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.38
2.5
Blake Lemon
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Elijah Adkisson
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.