Teams

CROWN BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-08vs SSTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrittany Biebl / Grace Fox vs Laurie Buelow / Patrice Lorenzen3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHilary Garnsey vs Stevie Ybarra0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Maggie Albrecht / Gillian Morris1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Feler / Karen Lambert vs Patricia Kreutz / Emilie Rogers6-2, 7-6
2025-06-08vs SSTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrittany Biebl / Karen Lambert vs Laurie Buelow / Patrice Lorenzen0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGrace Fox vs Stevie Ybarra0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Maggie Albrecht / Gillian Morris6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Feler / Hilary Garnsey vs Patricia Kreutz / Lisa Price3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-07vs SSTC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrittany Biebl / Karen Lambert vs Gillian Morris / Maggie Albrecht1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGrace Fox vs Patricia Kreutz0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Laurie Buelow / Patrice Lorenzen6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Leverson / Laurie Feler vs Emilie Rogers / Lisa Price6-3, 6-1
2025-06-07vs SSTC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesGrace Fox / Karen Lambert vs Gillian Morris / Maggie Albrecht2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBrittany Biebl vs Patrice Lorenzen6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Sarah Shook vs Patricia Kreutz / Laurie Buelow6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanet Leverson / Laurie Feler vs Emilie Rogers / Lisa Price6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Sarah Shook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Laurie Feler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brittany Biebl
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Janet Leverson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Grace Fox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Hilary Garnsey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Shook + Karen Lambert303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sarah Shook
35W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Laurie Feler
42W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Brittany Biebl
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Janet Leverson
26W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Grace Fox
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hilary Garnsey
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Lambert
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.