Teams

ERupert (Queens)

2023 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 9.0 - Wed PM

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-26vs LNali (Blakeney)Won 20
W#2 DoublesPhil Payne / Jackie Gaine vs Michelle Wright / Dave Tyson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLance King / Anna Tomkins vs Katy Hart / Arjun Som Sekhar6-4, 6-2
2023-07-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesQuinn Carmean / Anna Tomkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-12vs JVarn (Palisades)Won 20
W#1 DoublesEvgeny Slesarev / Anna Tomkins vs Jordan Bowers / Justin Wycoff7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHolly Natwick / Jason Hull vs Tanya Hecht / Keenan Ahern7-6, 6-4
2023-07-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesJackie Gaine / Phil Payne vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-30vs ESutker (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJason Hull / Holly Natwick vs Chase Lyles / Callie Schmit4-6, 2-6
2023-06-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesJason Hull / Holly Natwick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-08vs JGoldblatt/CGoldblatt (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnna Tomkins / Quinn Carmean vs Paula Beecher / Ben Richards2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 9.0 - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.96
Christian Hess
published 5
4.92
George Lovitt
published
4.55
Quinn Carmean
published
4.42
Jason Hull
published
4.31
Phil Payne
published
4.30
Jackie Gaine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
4.20
Anna Tomkins
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.07
Lance King
published
3.73
Elizabeth Heald
published
3.68
Holly Natwick
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
Evgeny Slesarev
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christian Hess
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.96
George Lovitt
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.92
Quinn Carmean
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.55
Jason Hull
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.42
Phil Payne
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Jackie Gaine
91W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
Hannah English Rahill
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
4.25
4.5
Anna Tomkins
352W–48L career · 7 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
4.20
Lance King
24W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
4.07
Elizabeth Heald
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Holly Natwick
85W–44L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.68
Evgeny Slesarev
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.