Teams

Maximum Tennis

2024 18&Over Women · 3.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesDenise Mincak / Cristina Mena vs Simone McGregor / Jenn Yee6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Karen Lee vs Leana Rahman / Christina Vitale6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChrissy Jee / Patricia Toolan vs Sarah Miller / Amy Listerman6-3, 6-3
2024-07-11vs Flint Park: Village PeopleLost 12
W#1 DoublesDenise Mincak / Cristina Mena vs JENNIFER LEIGH ZALUSKI / Dana Post7-5, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaila Worrell / Lan Yao vs Susan Barnes-Girling / Ann Goode6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSaori Iwasaki / Naomi Kono vs Amanda Michael / Arikha Moses3-6, 3-3
2024-06-27vs Pelham Rec: The Forever InsLost 13
L#1 DoublesMoira Lillis / Namiko Martin vs Wendy Ge / Alexandra Dudar1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Mincak / Laila Worrell vs Sarah Kim / Chandra Turner3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLan Yao vs Cara Moore2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Karen Lee vs Mei Lau / Lina Perl6-2, 6-1
2024-06-13vs NYAC Topspin TigersLost 14
L#1 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Laila Worrell vs Brody Rees / Tyson Newton Stephens6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJianhua Hu vs Frances Candela6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChrissy Jee / Akiko Senda vs Carol Fleming / Anna-Liisa Corsi6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLan Yao vs Julie Chang6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Bloch / Naomi Kono vs Stacy Gatto / Monica Mullan2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sullivan / Susan O'Brien vs Athena Maikish / Chris Gerosa6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDenise Mincak / Cristina Mena vs Danielle Morgan / Shelley Wahl6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJianhua Hu vs Kathryn Mae Alandy2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLan Yao / Laila Worrell vs Danielle Mebert / Adriana Souza6-0
2024-05-30vs Pelham Country ClubWon 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sullivan / Laila Worrell vs Jill Weyndling / Jaime Webb4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Chatham / Karen Lee vs Carol Melnick / Colleen O'Hagan6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJianhua Hu vs Melissa Kagan7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAkiko Senda / Saori Iwasaki vs Holly McNamara / Carmen Pagano Hartigan6-1, 7-6
2024-05-15vs Apawamis High StrungLost 13
L#1 DoublesLaila Worrell / Lan Yao vs Valerie Chuebon / Jennifer Mellet2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMilano Buckley vs Kati Vogiatjis1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Lee / Grayson Rueckert vs Cecelia Rees / Philippa Hartman4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAkiko Senda / Catherine Chatham vs Jodi Mcgill / Andrea Vogel4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-05-09vs Sportime MBYC Armada UNITEDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDenise Mincak / Cristina Mena vs Carrie Gallagher / Jenny Rende2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLan Yao vs Pamela Sheeran7-6, 2-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Bloch / Saori Iwasaki vs Colleen van Valen / Erica MacGregor2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesGrayson Rueckert vs Arjan Eenkema van Dijk0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-02vs AmackassinWon 31
L#1 DoublesCristina Mena / Denise Mincak vs Kerry O'Brien Hess / Maria DelGiudice0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWinnie Xie vs Maggie O'Neill6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Lee / Grayson Rueckert vs AnnMarie Butler / Bridget Hunt6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Bloch / Lan Yao vs Courtney Burns / Moira Kiernan7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Mariko Abdel-Rahman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.16
Denise Mincak
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Lan Yao
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.06
Cristina Mena
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
Milano Buckley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.02
Catherine Chatham
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.85
Laila Worrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Karen Lee
published
2.78
Moira Lillis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Akiko Senda
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Chrissy Jee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Jennifer Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Susan O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Grayson Rueckert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jianhua Hu
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Namiko Martin
published
Naomi Kono
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Toolan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Saori Iwasaki
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Winnie Xie
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Sullivan + Milano Buckley10264% games+16.0% vs expected
Lan Yao + Laila Worrell6553% games+5.4% vs expected
Cristina Mena + Denise Mincak341957% games+5.0% vs expected
Jennifer Sullivan + Catherine Chatham3253% games+4.1% vs expected
Laila Worrell + Grayson Rueckert1546% games+4.1% vs expected
Catherine Chatham + Milano Buckley17658% games+3.6% vs expected
Susan O'Brien + Jennifer Sullivan201054% games+1.6% vs expected
Moira Lillis + Susan O'Brien171052% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mariko Abdel-Rahman
124W–83L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Denise Mincak
54W–26L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Lan Yao
57W–41L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.07
3.5
Cristina Mena
41W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Milano Buckley
49W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Catherine Chatham
137W–102L career · 5 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Laila Worrell
37W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Karen Lee
32W–24L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Moira Lillis
64W–35L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Akiko Senda
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Chrissy Jee
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Jennifer Sullivan
67W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Susan O'Brien
50W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Grayson Rueckert
13W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43
Jianhua Hu
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Namiko Martin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Naomi Kono
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Toolan
18W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Saori Iwasaki
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Winnie Xie
40W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.