Teams

EConklin (Carmel): Wonder Women

2024-2025 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 3.5 Women Doubles; Daytime

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings32 teams · 3.5 Women Doubles; Daytime
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Catherine Bauer
published 3.5
3.29
Melanie Carroll
published
Erin Conklin
published 3.5
2.99
SUSAN ALIOTA
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SUSAN ALIOTA + Catherine Bauer224 matchesnot enough data
Erin Conklin + Catherine Bauer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Bauer
35W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Melanie Carroll
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Erin Conklin
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
SUSAN ALIOTA
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.