Teams

SAZ/Johnson/55MXD/8.0

Mixed 55 & Over- Winter · 8.0 mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-01-14vs Play BallWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebbie Sinagoga / Joel Robison vs Erika Hard / David Bellamy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCort Alcott / Sally Alcott vs Dian Li / Lisa Tucci6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJessica Navarro / Michael McMullen vs Birgit Allmann-Treusch / Scott Bronnimann6-1, 6-0
2024-01-14vs Honey & NutsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelley Quinn / Joe Johnson vs Terry Kirk / Jill Duckett6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael McMullen / Katie Campbell vs Liam Flynn / Sandra Tucker6-1, 7-5
2024-01-13vs El Con DT 55 8.0 MixedLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael McMullen / Katie Campbell vs Linda Groft / Chris Castro3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCort Alcott / Sally Alcott vs Michelle Heritage / Christopher Linscott6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoe Johnson / Debbie Sinagoga vs Linda Haycraft / Robert Garcia6-7, 6-7
2024-01-13vs Honey & NutsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoel Robison / Debbie Sinagoga vs James Wallen / Holly Rose6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCort Alcott / Sally Alcott vs Matthew Rohne / Cindy Madsen6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJoe Johnson / Kelley Quinn vs Chris Madsen / Sandra Tucker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Joel Robison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Cort Alcott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Debbie Sinagoga
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Sally Alcott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Katie Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jessica Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Johnson
published
Jose Rojas
published
Kelley Quinn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael McMullen
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael McMullen + Katie Campbell511663% games+13.2% vs expected
Cort Alcott + Sally Alcott6265% gamesnot enough data
Joel Robison + Debbie Sinagoga303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joel Robison
138W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Cort Alcott
38W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
4.34
4
Debbie Sinagoga
117W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
4.03
Sally Alcott
111W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
Katie Campbell
193W–169L career · 2 lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.42
Jessica Navarro
26W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Joe Johnson
21W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jose Rojas
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kelley Quinn
64W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael McMullen
71W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.