Teams

West Homewood - Gam

B'ham Spring Weeknight Prep League · 3.0 Men - Monday

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-27vs Gardendale - Zassoda needs MondayLost 13
L#1 DoublesMehar Virdi / Daniel Elliott vs Dylan Hamilton / Andy Hamilton4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesWill McMinn vs Joseph Thomas6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlex Collum / David Handra vs Wes Vaughn / Nicholas Tidy1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Helzer / CHRIS SARRIS vs Jonathan Kinney / Simon Sheng2-6, 2-6
2026-04-06vs Gardendale - Zassoda needs MondayLost 13
L#1 DoublesDaniel Elliott / Ben Ward vs Dylan Hamilton / Andy Hamilton6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPreston Nichols vs William Smith1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTai Smith / Will McMinn vs Jonathan Kinney / Forrest Fletcher6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCHRIS SARRIS / Alex Collum vs Simon Sheng / Joseph Thomas4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-30vs Gardendale - Zassoda needs MondayLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlex Collum / Taylor Lewis vs Dylan Hamilton / Andy Hamilton2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDavid Handra / Will McMinn vs Forrest Fletcher / Jonathan Kinney2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCHRIS SARRIS / Preston Nichols vs Joseph Thomas / Simon Sheng7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-30vs Gardendale - Zassoda needs MondayLost 04
L#1 DoublesBen Ward / CHRIS SARRIS vs Dylan Hamilton / Andy Hamilton0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWill McMinn vs William Smith4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Lewis / Mehar Virdi vs Nicholas Tidy / Jonathan Kinney3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesPreston Nichols / Todd Helzer vs Simon Sheng / Joseph Thomas1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men - Monday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gardendale - Zassoda needs Monday401427100
2West Homewood - Gam0421430188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Ben Ward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.17
Daniel Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.95
Tai Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Justin Weinstein
published
2.81
Mehar Virdi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Will McMinn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.64
CHRIS SARRIS
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.63
Alex Collum
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Jon Gam
published
2.53
David Handra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Trevor Gillies
published
2.15
Preston Nichols
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.10
Todd Helzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mehar Virdi + Daniel Elliott2353% games−6.3% vs expected
Alex Collum + Jon Gam033 matchesnot enough data
Tai Smith + Daniel Elliott123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ben Ward
6W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Daniel Elliott
30W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.17
Tai Smith
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
Justin Weinstein
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Mehar Virdi
40W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Will McMinn
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
CHRIS SARRIS
3W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Alex Collum
3W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63
Jon Gam
6W–12L career · no lines in 2026
0%39%61%
2.54
3
David Handra
10W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.53
Trevor Gillies
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Preston Nichols
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Todd Helzer
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.