Teams

Ossman/Nashville

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Amy Gilmore
published 4.5
4.37
Palina Beck
published
4.30
4.26
Lori Warrick
published
4.24
Caroline Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.18
Alana Mccormack
published 4.5
4.16
Kari Pendleton
published
3.97
Carly Phillips
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.82
Cindy Mccullough
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Noi Sengsouk
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Brenda Ossman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Janet Adamson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Warrick + Alana Mccormack4262% games+12.2% vs expected
Palina Beck + Amy Gilmore3254% games−5.6% vs expected
Lori Warrick + Janet Adamson5159% gamesnot enough data
Amy Gilmore + Alana Mccormack4159% gamesnot enough data
Noi Sengsouk + Caroline Lancaster404 matchesnot enough data
Palina Beck + PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO123 matchesnot enough data
Noi Sengsouk + Janet Adamson213 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Lancaster + Janet Adamson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Gilmore
30W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
4.49
Palina Beck
20W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.37
PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO
5W–17L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
Lori Warrick
24W–11L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
4
Caroline Lancaster
16W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
4.24
4.5
Alana Mccormack
28W–13L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Kari Pendleton
8W–8L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Carly Phillips
11W–1L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Cindy Mccullough
39W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Noi Sengsouk
19W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Brenda Ossman
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Janet Adamson
28W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.