Teams

CYang-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-30vs RSamulski-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesYinhao Ren vs Kellette Wade6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLetian Jiang vs Tommy Rose6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesChang Yang vs Grant Richter6-1, 6-2
2026-06-23vs CLynch-DURWon 21
L#1 SinglesBokang Zhou vs Joseph Davis2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesYinhao Ren vs Gregory Downing6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesHengning Cao vs Tom Luben6-1, 7-5
2026-06-09vs CGilley-CHCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesYinhao Ren vs Sammy Myers6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHengning Cao vs Scott Davies6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesChang Yang vs M Scott Alexander6-1, 6-1
2026-06-02vs JByrd-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesYinhao Ren vs Kaushik Vemulapalli6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesChang Yang vs Barry Gitarts3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesLetian Jiang vs Blake Jensen6-4, 7-6
2026-05-26vs BKing-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesBokang Zhou vs Adrian Bruno6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesHengning Cao vs Pablo Araya4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesLetian Jiang vs Harrison Bailey6-1, 6-2
2026-05-19vs SBurger-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesYinhao Ren vs Alex Stoffregen6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBokang Zhou vs Marcus Zebrowski6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesHengning Cao vs Andrew Thorne0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-12vs GHigh-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesYinhao Ren vs Ryan Phillips6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLetian Jiang vs Graham High6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesChang Yang vs Kevin McCarty6-4, 6-0
2026-05-05vs RMcGarrah-HRLost 12
W#1 SinglesBokang Zhou vs Mark Fossum6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesHengning Cao vs Michael Klein1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesChang Yang vs Caleb Kent0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CYang-DUR7118612132
2BKing-DUR35101429199
3GHigh-DUR2671741268
4RSamulski-CHTC1751938243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Bokang Zhou
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
3.26
Yinhao Ren
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.02
Letian Jiang
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.69
Hengning Cao
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3
2.62
Chang Yang
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hengning Cao + Letian Jiang314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bokang Zhou
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Yinhao Ren
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.26
Letian Jiang
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Hengning Cao
11W–11L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Chang Yang
8W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.