Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Smith

2022 Adult USTA 18-39 League · 8.0W

8 players · average NTRP 4.20 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-27vs Liberty Park Tennis-HuLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesLindsay Bianucci vs Elizabeth Vigil2-6, 4-6
2022-07-20vs Liberty Park Tennis-HuWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesKarin Smith / Lindsay Bianucci vs Staci Leishman / Hayley Pratt6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-13Won 10
W#1 Female DoublesKara Sargent / Lindsay Bianucci vs Olivia Hu / Cami Smith6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-29vs Liberty Park Tennis-HuWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesLindsay Bianucci / Megan Connelly vs Hayley Pratt / Jenn Fredrickson6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Liberty Park Tennis-Smith328716125
2Liberty Park Tennis-Hu237819141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Kemp
published 4.5
4.24
Karin Smith
published
4.11
Kara Sargent
usually #1 Female Doubles 33%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 4.5
Anne Young
published 4
Lindsay Bianucci
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.73
Jordyn Parry
usually #1 Female Doubles 43%, also #1 Female Singles 29% · published 4
3.72
Megan Connelly
published
3.37
Lauren Bryce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Bianucci + Lauren Bryce123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Kemp
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karin Smith
143W–70L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Kara Sargent
56W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
4
Anne Young
11W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Lindsay Bianucci
60W–66L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jordyn Parry
168W–127L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Megan Connelly
46W–46L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
Lauren Bryce
63W–65L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.