Teams

Dare Doubles-Restani

2024 Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over · Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-16vs Morning Star-VillalobosLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristen Harsha / Owen Seely vs Denise Terrell / Drew Campbell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Rowley / Quentin Carter vs Kristin Shifflett / Evan Charles7-5, 6-4
2024-03-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesNevena Arsic / Naveen Chennupati vs Caroline Charles / Evan Charles7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-02-21vs Morning Star-VillalobosWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Rowley / Quentin Carter vs Denise Terrell / Drew Campbell6-3, 7-6
2024-02-10vs Morning Star-VillalobosWon 10
W#2 DoublesNevena Arsic / Naveen Chennupati vs Tanaka Chakanyuka / Q Pennings6-2, 6-3
2024-02-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNevena Arsic / Randolph Smyth vs Caroline Charles / Evan Charles2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-01-27vs Morning Star-VillalobosWon 10
W#1 DoublesNevena Arsic / Randolph Smyth vs Tanaka Chakanyuka / David Sharon6-2, 7-6
2024-01-18vs Morning Star-VillalobosWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristen Harsha / Owen Seely vs Jena Olsen / Jerry Christoforatos6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fredericksburg Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Alicia Rowley
published 5
4.58
Christen Harsha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.46
Naveen Chennupati
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.43
Nevena Arsic
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
Erin Waters
published
3.98
Quentin Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
3.74
Owen Seely
published
Laura Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Naveen Chennupati + Nevena Arsic17264% games+15.1% vs expected
Quentin Carter + Nevena Arsic5072% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alicia Rowley
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Christen Harsha
480W–135L career · 2 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.58
4.5
Naveen Chennupati
145W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
4.46
4.5
Nevena Arsic
96W–37L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
4.43
Erin Waters
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Quentin Carter
201W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Bindhya Rusu-Mehes
6W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Owen Seely
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Laura Smith
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.