Teams

Paseo Zimmer Wald

2023 LeeCharlotte Combo 50 & Over Spring · Women 7.5 - Friday - DAY

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-09vs Colonial DunbarLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheri Coleman / Beth Rattner-Renz vs Christine Brodsky / Karen Moss5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2023-06-02vs Vivante LansdaleWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Coleman / Beth Rattner-Renz vs Janet Kramer / Edie Schwenck6-4, 6-4
2023-05-26vs Corkscrew Shores LowellWon 10
W#2 DoublesSheri Coleman / Beth Rattner-Renz vs Anne Jenson / Darina Cammarato6-3, 6-1
2023-05-12vs LEECHAR/Gibbs/50&Over7.5WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSheri Coleman / Beth Rattner-Renz vs Denise Weisinger / J Q Hall6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGena Barone / Judith Hudetz vs Emma Hackett-Ayllon / Susan Fiorillo3-6, 1-6
2023-05-05vs Colonial DunbarWon 10
W#2 DoublesSheri Coleman / Beverly Gostomski vs Ginny Asgeirsson / Karen Dunbar6-2, 6-1
2023-04-21vs Corkscrew Shores LowellWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Campbell / Sheri Coleman vs Glara Yi-Powell / Joy Ecker6-4, 6-2
2023-04-14vs Seminole Lakes DomingoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudith Hudetz / Amanda Patten vs Diane DeGurian / Sharon McQueen0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSheri Coleman / Shelly Zimmer Wald vs Petra Klos / Mae Nelson Stone6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-07vs LEECHAR/Gibbs/50&Over7.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSheri Coleman / Beth Rattner-Renz vs Katie Blakeslee / Susan Fiorillo6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmanda Patten / Judith Hudetz vs Catherine Colfer / Nancy Aloia6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 - Friday - DAY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
3.67
3.44
Amanda Patten
published 3.5
3.35
Pamella Attuso
published
3.34
Judith Hudetz
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Shelly Zimmer Wald
published
Diane Borillo
published 3.5
3.25
Jill Hoffman
published
3.16
Beverly Gostomski
published 3.5
3.13
Janet Choisnet
published
Kelly Olson
published
Sheri Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carla Kellemberger
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.94
4
Beth Rattner-Renz
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Amanda Patten
23W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Pamella Attuso
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Judith Hudetz
145W–53L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Shelly Zimmer Wald
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Diane Borillo
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Hoffman
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Beverly Gostomski
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Janet Choisnet
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Kelly Olson
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheri Coleman
132W–73L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.